Writ petition under Article 226 challenging a private family dispute between petitioner and respondent No. 5. Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the writ as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.11.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN W.P.(MD) No.22321 of 2018
P.Madhana Meeran
... Petitioner
vs.
Old No.785, New No.158, Royala Tower, 4th Floor, Anna Salai, Mount Road,
Chennai-2.
Madurai-625 016.
Madurai City.
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to take appropriate action against the Respondent No.5 by considering the representation dated 23.03.2018 made by the Petitioner within the time stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.I.Pinaygash For Respondents : Mr.K.Prabhu Central Government Standing Counsel for R.1 and R.2
ORDER
When this Court has expressed its intention to dismiss the writ petition on the ground that it is a private dispute between the son and father, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2
Sd/Assistant Registrar(W)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-II)
To
VB/PM/SAR2/28.11.2018/2P/7C
W.P.(MD) No.22321 of 2018 01.11.2018
P. Madhana Meeran
The State Passport Officer
The Regional Officer
The Commissioner of Police
The Inspector of Police
Pitchaikani
V. Parthiban
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
