Writ petition under Article 226 filed seeking direction to consider representations regarding pension matters dismissed for default on account of petitioner's non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.02.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN and
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA
W.P(MD)No.21969 of 2017
C.Udhayasuria Kannan ... Petitioner
Vs.
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 5 to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 22.05.2017, 24.05.2017, 25.05.2017, 22.09.2017 and 25.09.2017 within a stipulated time as fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.P.Subbiah
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by M.SATHYANARAYANAN,J. ) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ The matter was listed on 12.02.2018 and on that date, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and hence,
2
the matter was directed to be listed "for dismissal" on 14.02.2018.
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
+1cc to Mr.P.Subbiah, Advocate Sr.No.49089
SSL
VB/KKR/SAR1/27.02.2018/2P/7C
W.P(MD)No.21969 of 2017 14.02.2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
C.Udhayasuria Kannan
The Ministry for Personnel, Public grievances and pensions, Department of personal and training, North block (RR SECTION), New Delhi
M.SATHYANARAYANAN
R.HEMALATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
