Notary applicant sought writ to quash order rejecting renewal of practicing certificate. Petitioner's counsel sought and granted permission to withdraw the petition before the High Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.11.2018 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
Writ Petition(MD)No.2146 of 2014 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2014
Thiru. V.N.K.Palanivel ... Petitioner Vs.
Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.
... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order dated 17.12.2008 passed in G.O.Ms.No.432 of the first respondent rejecting petitioner's application dated 23.02.2008 for renewal of certificate of practicing as Notary in the area of Tirunelveli District and quash the same consequently directing the first respondent to renew the petitioner's certificate of practising as Notary.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sekar
For Respondents: Mr.D.Muruganantham
Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(Records)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar(cs-IV)
2
To
+1cc to Special Government Pleader, SR.No.94745
Writ Petition(MD)No.2146 of 2014 09.11.2018
AKV
PSSKN SAR4 31.12.2018 2P 4C
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V.N.K. Palanivel
State of Tamil Nadu
C. Saravanan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
