Disposed

K.Arumugam v. the District Collector

Madras HC13 Nov 2018WP(MD)/21352/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought a directive for the respondents to remove encroachments on a public road. The High Court directed the District Collector and Tahsildar to conduct a survey and initiate removal action within 8 weeks of receiving the order copy.

What did the court decide?

Directed the District Collector and Tahsildar to conduct a survey and remove the encroachment within 8 weeks.

K.Arumugam Vs the District Collector — Property and Title | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.11.2018 CORAM: THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH AND THE HON'BLE Mrs. JUSTICE R.THARANI W.P.(MD)No.21352 of 2018

K.Arumugam

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

¶7

2.The Tahsildar, Madurai East Taluk, Madurai District.

3.Muthusami

4.A.Pootharaj

... Respondents

PRAYER: The petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to take appropriate action for removal of encroachment made by the respondents 3 and 4 and other individuals at public road in Survey No.138/9B at Malaichamipuram Village, Y.Othakadai Post, Madurai East Taluk, Madurai District by considering the representation dated 26.02.2018.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Pandian For Respondents : Mr.P.Sethuraman, Spl.G.P. for R1 & R2 No appearance for R3 Mr.R.Sivalingam for R4

¶13

ORDER

¶14

(Order of the Court was made by R.SUBBIAH,J.)

¶15

This Writ petition has been filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to take appropriate action for removal of encroachment made by the respondents 3 & 4 and others in the public road in Survey No.138/9B at Malaichamipuram Village, Y.Othakadai Post, Madurai East Taluk, Madurai District by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 26.02.2018.

¶16

2.It is the case of the petitioner that he is residing in the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ above said Village. The road in Survey No.138/9B at Malaichamipuram Village, Y.Othakadai Post, Madurai East Taluk, Madurai District has

¶17

¶18

been encroached by the respondents 3 & 4 and also others by putting up petty shops, which affects the ingress and egress of the general public. In this regard, the petitioner has made a representation to the first respondent on 26.02.2018. In response to the same, the first respondent forwarded the same to the second respondent for taking necessary action. However, no steps have been taken so far. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court with the present Writ petition for the aforesaid relief.

¶19

3.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 & 2 and Mr.R.Sivalingam, learned counsel appearing for the fourth respondent.

¶20

4.After hearing the arguments on either side, the respondents 1 and 2 are hereby directed to conduct a survey with field map and other relevant documents, if any and if the above said road is encroached, the respondents 1 and 2 shall initiate necessary action to remove such encroachment in accordance with law. The entire exercise shall be completed, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, this Writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶21

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-III)

¶22

/True Copy/

¶23

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-I)

¶24

¶25

1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

¶26

2.The Tahsildar, Madurai East Taluk, Madurai District.

¶27

• 1 CC TO Mr.M.Pandian , ADVOCATE IN SR No.95085. Nbj DS SKN SAR1 30 11 2018 2P 4C

¶28

W.P.(MD)No.21352 of 2018 13.11.2018

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Arumugam v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Arumugam v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.C.Ganesan Vs the District Collector

Dhanalakshmi, Vs the District Collector

Sarathambal, Vs the District Collector

J.Mahamudha Banu Vs the Superintendent of Police

Chinnasamy Vs the District Collector

The South Indian Bank Vs the District Collector