Division Bench dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging a notice for unapproved construction, holding the petitioner's belated reply indicated lack of merit.
Petition dismissed, no costs awarded, connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.09.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA
AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.(MD)No.19776 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD).No.17558 of 2018
A.Taj Nisha Begum ... Petitioner
Vs.
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other writ or direction in the nature of writ and call for the records of impugned order in Notice dated 16.04.2018 and quash the same as illegal.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah For R1 to R3 : Mr.C.Ramar
Additional Govt. Pleader
O R D E R
[Order of the Court was made by T.RAJA,J. ]
This writ petition is directed against the notice issued by the fourth respondent / the Special Officer, Maraikkayarpattinam Panchayat, Ramanathapuram District, dated 16.04.2018, calling upon the petitioner to explain why action should not be taken against https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the petitioner for the building put up by her without seeking approval from the competent authority.
2
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-II)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)
To
+1cc to Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah, Advocate Sr.No.84410 +1cc to Spl.Government Pleader Sr.No.84733
AKV
VB/RSK/SAR4/08.10.2018/2P/7C
W.P.(MD)No.19776 of 2018 14.09.2018
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging a notice for unapproved construction should be allowed.
Whether the petitioner's belated reply affects the merit of the challenge.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.Taj Nisha Begum
The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District
The Commissioner, O/o. The Mandabam Panchayat Union
The Zonal Deputy Block Development Officer, Zonal -4
The Special Officer, Maraikkayarpattinam Panchayat
T.RAJA
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
