The petitioner failed to appear on several listing dates despite directions to verify and print their name. The writ petition regarding encroachment was dismissed for default without costs.
The writ petition was dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 07.03.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA
W.P(MD)No.19520 of 2017 and W.M.P.(MD)No.15818 of 2017
K.V.Parvathymuthu
: Petitioner
Vs.
1.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.
2.The Executive Officer, Thiruchendur Special Town Panchayat, Thiruchendur, Tirunelveli District.
3.N.R.S.Ganesan : Respondents
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.08.2017 to remove the encroachment by demolishing the construction made by the third respondent in Survey No.307/3B Kheel Thiruchendur, Saravana Poigai Road, Thiruchendur.
For Petitioner : No appearance
For Respondent No.1 : Mr.C.Marichelliah Prabhu Additional Government Pleader For Respondent No.2 : Mr.R.Karthikeyan
For Respondent No.3 : Mr.D.Nallathambi
ORDER
[Order of the Court was made by M.SATHYANARAYANAN,J.]
The matter was listed on 19.02.2018 and it was submitted that https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner has withdrawn his appearance and therefore, this Court has directed the Registry to
2
verify as to whether any other Counsel entered appearance on behalf of the petitioner, if so, print the name of the Counsel, otherwise, print the name of the petitioner.
2.The matter was listed on 05.03.2018, and on that day, though the name of the petitioner was printed, there was no appearance and it was directed to be listed today, under the caption “for dismissal”.
3.Today, when the matter is called, once again, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, though her name is printed.
4.Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CSIII) /True Copy/
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
1.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.
2.The Executive Officer, Thiruchendur Special Town Panchayat, Thiruchendur, Tirunelveli District.
+One cc to The Special Government Pleader, SR.No.54325
MR
RL/4C/2P/SV/MMS/SAR2/26/3/2018
W.P(MD)No.19520 of 2017
07.03.2018
K.V.Parvathymuthu
The District Collector, Thoothukudi District
The Executive Officer, Thiruchendur Special Town Panchayat
N.R.S.Ganesan
M.SATHYANARAYANAN
R.HEMALATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
