Dismissed

Thangavel v. the District Collector

Madras HC5 Sept 2018WP(MD)/19226/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order dismisses a writ petition challenging a directive for encroachment removal. The Court held that pendency of a civil suit on adjacent lands and issuance of patta for specific lands did not prevent the authority from proceeding with removal of encroachment found on the designated survey number.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is dismissed and the respondents are directed to proceed with the removal of encroachment found in S.No.808. No costs.

Thangavel Vs the District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.09.2018 CORAM :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA AND

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

¶5

W.P(MD)No.19226 of 2018

Thangavel

... Petitioner

vs.

The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Dindigul.

¶10

The Tahsildar, Office of the Dindigul East Taluk, Dindigul.

¶11

The Block Development officer, Sanarpatti Panchayat Union, Dindigul District. ... Respondents

¶12

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 3^rd respondent herein in Na.Ka.No.1605/2018/Thi.3 dated 20.08.2018 and quash the same and consequently forbearing the respondents from in any way interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner situated at Survey No.809/1, 809/2 situated at Siluvathur village, Dindigul East Taluk, Dindigul District.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.Niranjan S.Kumar for Mr.M.Chellapandian

¶14

For Respondents: Mr.C.Ramar Additional Government Pleader

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

(Order of the Court was made by T.RAJA, J.)

¶17

This Writ Petition is directed against the impugned proceedings dated 20.08.2018 issued by the Block Development Officer, Sanarpatti Panchayat Union, Dindigul District, the third respondent herein, directing the Tahsildar East Taluk, Dindigul, to take all possible steps to remove the encroachment found in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ S.No.808 fixing the date for removal of encroachment on 05.09.2018, ie., today.

¶18

¶19

2.Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has been residing only in S.Nos.809/1, 809/2 (New Survey No.349/2) and not in S.No.808 of Siluvathur Village. Therefore, the question of encroachment put up by the petitioner in S.No.808 does not arise at all and if the respondents find any encroachment in S.No.808, the petitioner has no objection for removal of such encroachment, he contended. It is also submitted that the petitioner has filed a civil suit in O.S.No.151/2018 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Dindigul seeking a decree for bare injunction only with respect to S.Nos.809/1 and 809/2 (New Survey No.349/2).

¶20

Therefore, the pendency of the civil suit will not stand in the way of the respondents to proceed with the removal of encroachment, if it is found in S.No.808. Learned counsel also brought to the notice of this Court that patta has been issued in favour of the petitioner in respect of the lands in S.Nos.809/1 and 809/2 and it is for the respondents to consider the patta land also, while removing the encroachment.

¶21

In view of the above, we are unable to find any merit in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition fails and the same is dismissed. However, it is made clear that the respondents shall proceed with the removal of encroachment found in S.No.808. No costs. Consequently, connected WMP(MD).No.17064/18 is closed

¶22

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-II)

¶23

¶24

1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Dindigul.

¶25

2.The Tahsildar, Office of the Dindigul East Taluk, Dindigul.

¶26

3.The Block Development officer, Sanarpatti Panchayat Union, Dindigul District.

¶27

1 CC TO MR.M.CHELLAPANDIAN, ADVOCATE IN SR NO.82256 RR BU/NM/RSK/SAR-2 :14.11.2018 : 2P/5C

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶29

W.P(MD)No.19226 of 2018 05.09.2018

Thangavel v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thangavel v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.Pounraj, Vs the District Collector

S.Francis Vs the Distirct Collector

S. Piyarijan, Vs the Assistant Commissioner

Mrs.Paravathyammal, Vs Karur Vysya Bank

Mrs.Indira Vs Karur Vysya Bank

T.K.Krishnasamy Vs the Authorized Officer