Mohan, S/O.Arumugam, v. the Senior Commandant
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench held that while the respondent stands must apply minimum marks for promotion, the petitioner's long service and shortfall necessitate reassessment. It directed the fourth respondent to consider the petitioner for promotion to Assistant Sub Inspector along with eligible candidates within six months.
What did the court decide?
Directing the fourth respondent to consider the petitioner's case for promotion to the post of Assistant Sub Inspector along with other eligible candidates within a period of six months from receipt o
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 05.03.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
W.P.(MD)No.19080 of 2016 and W.M.P(MD)No.13783 of 2016
Mohan
... Petitioner
Vs. 1.The Senior Commandant C.I.S.F Unit SCCL, Singaneri Andhra Pradesh (Telangana). 2.The Assistant commandant, Central Industrial Security Force, Unit SCCL, Madaram Area, Adilabad District, Andhra Pradesh (Telangana) 3.The Assistant Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force Unit, South Region, Sriperambur Taluk, Kancheepuram District, Tamil Nadu. 4.The Group Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force, South Zone Headquarters, Rajaji Bhavan, Basant Nagar, Chennai. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the fourth respondent in his proceedings No.E-31014/MACP/CISF/GHC/ADM-1/2016532 dated 03.03.2016 and the order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings No.V-11015/Min-Appl/AM/Disc/2012/2346 dated https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 31.03.2012 and proceedings of the 2nd respondent made in V-
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a Head Constable passing the minimum benchmark by two marks can be promoted as a specially deserving employee despite the respondents reeking strict compliance with marks criteria.
Whether the petitioner's long service mandates a special consideration for promotion despite failing the promotion merit criteria.
Whether the fourth respondent is directed to reassess the petitioner's promotion case within a specific timeframe.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mohan
- respondent
The Senior Commandant C.I.S.F Unit SCCL, Singaneri Andhra Pradesh
- respondent
The Assistant commandant, Central Industrial Security Force, Unit SCCL, Madaram Area
- respondent
The Assistant Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force Unit, South Region, Sriperambur Taluk
- respondent
The Group Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force, South Zone Headquarters
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court