The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking cancellation of patta proceedings. The High Court found the prayer infructuous as the first respondent had cancelled the patta vide proceedings dated 10.09.2018. The petition was closed.
Petition closed as infructuous; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.09.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.RAJA
and
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
W.P.(MD) No.18470 of 2018
P.Natarajan ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai District, Madurai.
2.The Tahsildar, Vadipatti Taluk, Vadipatti, Madurai District.
3.Shanthi
4.Kesavan ... Respondents
PRAYER: The writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to expedite the patta cancellation proceedings in respect of pathway runs through Survey No.50/5B1 situated at Kallanai Village, Vadipatti Taluk, Alanganallur, Madurai District within a time frame as fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Jeganathan For Respondents : Mr.C.Ramar 1 and 2 Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by T.RAJA, J.)
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 have jointly made a statement that the prayer in this Writ Petition has https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ become infructuous as the first respondent, vide proceedings dated 10.09.2018, has cancelled the patta. The proceedings dated 10.09.2018 is placed on record.
2
2.In view of the submission made by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 and placing on record the proceedings dated 10.09.2018 issued by the first respondent, this Writ Petition is closed as infructuous. No costs. SD
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ( CS I )
TRUE COPY
SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ( CS IV )
SRM
To 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Tahsildar, Vadipatti Taluk, Vadipatti, Madurai District.
1CC TO MR. M.A. PALANISAMI, ADVOCATE SR 84189 1CC TO THE SPL GOVT PLEADER SR 84076 DS RSK SAR 4 1 10 2018 2P 4C
W.P.(MD) No.18470 of 2018
11.09.2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Natarajan
The Revenue Divisional Officer
The Tahsildar
Shanthi
Kesavan
T. RAJA
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
