S.Uma Maheswari v. the District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed for appointment order in an Anganwadi was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.11.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
W.P.(MD)No.17642 of 2018
S.Uma Maheswari ...Petitioner
Vs.
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to give appointment order to the petitioner in Nallamanayakkanpatti Anganwadi, E.Sidhur Post, Eriyodu, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District, interview held on 31.08.2017 by Children Development Planning Officer.
ORDER
Today, when the case was taken up for hearing, Mr.S.Pugalendhi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement in the court bundle to that effect.
Sd/
Assistant Registrar(Crl.Side)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-III)
2
To 1) The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2) The Children Development Planning Officer, Children Development Planning Office, Vedasandur, Dindigul District. +1 cc to M/s.S.Pugalendhi,Advocate,SR.No.96478 +1 cc to Spl.Govt.Pleader,SR.No.96783 sts SS/SV/SAR 3/13.12.2018/2P/5C Order in W.P.(MD)No.17642 of 2018 22.11.2018
S. Uma Maheswari
The District Collector, Dindigul District
The Children Development Planning Officer
G. Jayachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court