Writ petition for Mandamus filed under Article 226 of the Constitution. Petitioner did not appear when the matter was listed. Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 07.08.2018 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA And THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
W.P(MD)No.15782 of 2018
G.Inbarasan ... Petitioner
vs.
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider his representation dated 07.05.2018 within the time stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : No Appearance
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by T.RAJA, J.)
This writ petition was filed for issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider his representation, dated 07.05.2018, within the time stipulated by this Court.
2.When the matter was taken up, no one appeared in the morning session. Again, when the matter was passed over and taken up at 2.25 p.m., none appeared. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar (AS)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-III)
2
To
Rj2
MK/SKN/SAR 3/29.08.2018/2P/4C
Order made in W.P(MD)No.15782 of 2018 07.08.2018
G.Inbarasan
The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul
The Tahsildhar, Dindigul District, Dindigul
The Assistant Director, Town and Country Planning, Dindigul District
T.RAJA
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
