The Madras High Court, Madurai Bench dismissed the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution as infructuous at the hearing on 13th March 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 13.03.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.(MD) No.12936 of 2011 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2011
S.Sahayaraj ...Petitioner
Vs.
PRAYER : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 & 2 to recover the gratuity amount due to the petitioner under the Revenue Recovery Act from the 3rd respondent in view of the award passed in G.C.No.8/07 dated 01.07.2010.
O R D E R
When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought for in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ this writ petition has become infructuous.
2
2.Recording such submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(AE)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
+1cc to Mr.E.Udhaya, Advocate Sr.No.55268 +1cc to Spl.Government Pleader Sr.No.55118
MM
VB/SV/MMS/SAR1/12.04.2018/2P/5C
W.P.(MD) No.12936 of 2011 13.03.2018
S.Sahayaraj
The District Collector, Pudukottai District
The Tahsildar, Annavasal Post, Iluppur Taluk, Pudukottai District
The Special Officer, M.M.573, Annavasal Primary Agricultural Co-operative Bank Ltd
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
