Disposed

M.Ramuthai v. the District Collector

Madras HC18 Jun 2018WP(MD)/12812/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought mandamus for survey and demarcation of her land. The Court directed respondents to survey and demarcate the property after giving notice to the petitioner and adjacent owners within two months, then disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Response was to give notice to petitioner and adjacent land owners before surveying and demarcating land within two months.

M.Ramuthai Vs the District Collector — Property and Title | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 18.06.2018

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ

¶6

W.P(MD)No.12812 of 2018

M.Ramuthai

... Petitioner

Vs.

The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Madurai District.

¶11

The Tahsildar, Usilampatti Taluk, Usilampatti, Madurai District.

¶12

The Head Surveyor, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District. ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to measure and demarcate the petitioner's land bearing Survey No.198/53 and Town Survey No.23, situated at Annambaripatti village, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District, within the time frame as fixed by this Court and also by taking into account the Survey Fee paid on 29.06.2017.

¶14

For Petitioner : Ms.A.Rajini

¶15

For Respondents : Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah Additional Government Pleader

¶16

¶17

ORDER

¶18

Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents.

¶19

By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ disposal.

¶20

¶21

The petitioner is the owner of the land in S.No.198/53 and T.S.No.23 situated at Annambaripatti village, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District. Since she is running a dairy farm in that land, she wanted to demarcate the property by metes and bounds. In spite of repeated requests, the respondents have not surveyed her land. Hence, this writ petition is filed.

¶22

I have considered the rival contentions.

¶23

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, a direction is issued to the respondents 2 and 3 to consider the request of the petitioner for survey and demarcation of her land, after giving notice to her and the adjacent land owners, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶24

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶25

Sd/-

¶26

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶27

/True Copy/

¶28

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶29

¶30

The District Collector,

¶31

Office of the District Collector,

¶32

Madurai District.

¶33

The Tahsildar, Usilampatti Taluk, Usilampatti,

¶34

Madurai District.

¶35

The Head Surveyor, Usilampatti Taluk,

¶36

Madurai District.

¶37

- 1 cc TO Mr.A.Rajini , Advocate in SR No. 68582 + 1 cc TO The Special Government Pleader in SR No. 68633

¶38

rsb

¶39

AE/SV MMS/SAR1/28.06.2018/2P/6C

¶40

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶41

W.P(MD)No.12812 of 2018 18.06.2018

M.Ramuthai v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Ramuthai v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Neethivelan Vs the District Collector

P.Rajalingam Vs the District Collector

Tmt.T.Deva Anugragha Vs the Regional Transport Officer

Praveen, S/O.Ponbadi, Vs the Assistant General Manager

Tvl.Vasantham Departmental and Vs the Commissioner of Commercial

R.Mariammal Vs the District Collector