Disposed

Alagar S/O Muthusamy, v. the District Collector

Madras HC15 Nov 2018WP(MD)/12347/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged conversion of a water body into plots. Court directed the Tahsildar to dispose of a petitioner representation, notify encroachers, and remove encroachment within four months. Petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the 4th respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, notify respondents 5-7, and remove encroachment within four months if necessary.

Alagar S/O Muthusamy, Vs the District Collector — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.11.2018 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU

¶3

W.P. (MD) No. 12347 of 2014

¶4

Alagar ... Petitioner -vs-

¶5

1.The District Collector, Karur District,Karur.

¶6

2.The Superintendent of Police, Karur District,Karur.

¶7

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kulithalai Sub-Division, Kulithalai, Karur District.

¶8

4.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Kulithalai.

¶9

5.Shanmugam 6.Palaniyandi 7.Durairaj ... Respondents

¶10

PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to restrain the respondents 5 to 7 from removing the banks of Muttikulam and converting the same as plots and from doing any activity in the Muttikulam located at Muttakkampatti hamlet, Kalugur Village, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.T.M.Madasamy For Respondents 1 to 4 : Mr. A.K. Baskarapandian Special Government Pleader For Respondents 5 to 7 : No appearance

¶12

ORDER

¶13

(Order of the Court was made by K.K.SASIDHARAN, J.)

¶14

The petitioner has come up with a grievance that the respondents 5 to 7 took possession of the land abetting the water body “Muttikulam” and converted the same as plots. The petitioner therefore seeks appropriate direction to the revenue department to https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ take action against the respondents 5 to 7.

¶15

¶16

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

¶17

Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 4. None appears on behalf of the respondents 5 to 7, inspite of printing their name in the cause list after service of notice.

¶18

3.We direct the fourth respondent to consider and dispose of

¶19

the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 24.07.2014, after issuing notice to the respondents 5 to 7. In case, it is found that respondents 5 to 7 are in unauthorised occupation of public property necessary action should be taken for removal of encroachment till its logical end. Such exercise shall be completed within a period of four months from the dated of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶20

4.The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above direction. No

¶21

Costs.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

Assistant Registrar(Crl.side)

¶24

/True Copy/

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-I)

¶26

¶27

1.The District Collector,

¶28

Karur District,Karur.

¶29

2.The Superintendent of Police, Karur District,Karur.

¶30

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kulithalai Sub-Division,

¶31

Kulithalai, Karur District.

¶32

4.The Tahsildar,

¶33

Taluk Office,Kulithalai.

¶34

+1CC to Mr.T.M.Madasamy, Advocate, SR.No.95472

¶35

W.P. (MD) No. 12347 of 2014

¶36

15.11.2018

¶37

¶38

ES/SKN/RSK/SAR 1/12.12.2018/2P/6C

¶39

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Alagar S/O Muthusamy, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Alagar S/O Muthusamy, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Swaminathan, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Alagarsamy, Vs the District Collector

Mr. Muthu Vs Mr. a. Karthik

S.Syed Abdul Khader, Vs the Regional Transport

M.J. Jahangir Vs the District Collector

C.Rengaraju Vs Sampath