Dismissed

P. Selvi, v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC27 Mar 2018WP(MD)/12014/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner, a secondary grade teacher, challenged a transfer order affecting another teacher at the same school and sought promotion to B.T. Assistant in English. The High Court held promotion is not a matter of right and noted the previous promotion panel had expired. The petition was dismissed as no legal ground for promotion was established.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition stands dismissed with no order as to costs.

P. Selvi, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 27.03.2018

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.12014 of 2011 and M.P(MD)Nos.2 and 3 of 2011

¶7

P.Selvi, Wife of Kasipandian, Secondary Grade Teacher,. Panchayat Union Primary School, Sithakkoor, Madurai East Panchayat Union, Madurai District. ... Petitioner -vs-

¶8

The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Secretary, Department of School Education, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶9

The Director of Elementary Education, College Road, Chennaio – 600 006.

¶10

The District Elementary Educational Officer, Madurai, Madurai District.

¶11

The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Madurai East Union, No.1, Kamala Street, Tallakulam, Madurai – 625 002.

¶12

The Headmaster, Panchayat Union Primary School, Sithakkoor, Madurai East Panchayat Union, Madurai District.

¶13

The Headmaster, Panchayat Union Middle School, Kabeer Nagar, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Madurai East Union, Madurai – 625 020.

¶14

¶15

S.V.Shanthi, B.T Assistant in English, Panchayat Union Middle School, Thonthilingapuram, Kottampatti Union, Madurai District. ... Respondents

¶16

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the impugned order issued by the third respondent/The District Elementary Educational Officer in favour of the 7^th respondent vide Na.Ka.No.2073/A5/2011, dated 3.9.2011 and to quash the same and to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to consider forthwith the Petitioner for the post of B.T.Assistant in English in the sixth respondent Panchayat Union Middle School at Kabeer Nagar, Madurai East Union, Madurai – 625 020 by way of promotion for which the Petitioner is legally entitled to.

¶17

For Petitioner : M/s.B.K.Rajendran For Respondents : Mr.R.Sethuraman 1 to 4 Special Government Pleader For Respondents : No appearance 5 and 6 For Respondent-7 : Mr.S.Visvalingam

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

The order of transfer, dated 3.9.2011 is under challenge in this Writ Petition. Further direction is sought for to consider the name of the Writ Petitioner for promotion to the post of B.T.Assistant English in the sixth respondent Panchayat Union Middle School at Kabeer Nagar, Madurai East Union, Madurai – 625 020.

¶20

2.On a perusal of the impugned transfer order, dated 3.9.2011, the 7^th respondent/ B.T.Assistant English was transferred from Panchayat Union Middle School, Thonthilingapuram, Kottampatti Union, Madurai District to Panchayat Union Middle School, Kabeer Nagar, Madurai East. The transfer order issued transferring the 7^th respondent is under challenge in this Writ Petition.

¶21

3.This Court is of an opinion that the Writ Petitioner is absolutely unconnected in respect of the transfer order issued against the 7^th respondent. This apart, 7^th r4espondent had already joined in the transferred place at Madurai East and serving for the past more than seven years. Under these circumstances, transfer order implemented in the year 2011 need not be interfered https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ with and the Writ Petitioner has not established any legal ground for quashing the impugned order of transfer. Probably, the Writ

¶22

¶23

Petitioner would have challenged the transfer order on the ground that she must be promoted to the Post of B.T.Assistant in the Panchayat Union Middle School, Kabeer Nagar, Madurai East. Further, the transfer of a teacher from one school to another school cannot constitute a ground for another teacher to set aside the transfer order and promote her as B.T.Assistant in the said school. Such relief cannot be granted in respect of promotion. It is brought to the notice of this Court that panel for promotion during the relevant of time was prepared and the name of the Writ Petitioner was also included in the list. But no promotion was effected. The Panel became in-valid after a period of one year as per the rules of administration. If at all the authorities have taken a decision to grant promotion, then a fresh panel is to be prepared based on the rules in force.

¶24

4.Promotion can never be claimed as a matter of right. However, consideration is a right. Whenever the authorities competent have taken a decision to prepare a panel for promotion, then the names of all eligible persons are to be considered. Thus the Writ Petitioner has not made out any ground for grant of promotion. Further the name of the Petitioner was also considered and no promotion was granted to any candidate during the relevant point of time and whenever new panel is prepared, then the names of all eligible persons are to be considered including the name of the Petitioner.

¶25

5.In this view of the matter, the Writ Petitioner has not made out any legal ground so as to grant promotion as such sought for in this Writ Petition.

¶26

6.Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed.

¶27

Sd/-

¶28

Assistant Registrar(W)

¶29

/True Copy/

¶30

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶31

¶32

The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of School Education, Fort St.George, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Chennai – 600 009.

¶33

¶34

The Director of Elementary Education, College Road, Chennaio – 600 006.

¶35

The District Elementary Educational Officer, Madurai, Madurai District. 4. The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Madurai East Union, No.1, Kamala Street, Tallakulam, Madurai – 625 002. 5. The Headmaster, Panchayat Union Primary School, Sithakkoor, Madurai East Panchayat Union, Madurai District. 6. The Headmaster, Panchayat Union Middle School, Kabeer Nagar, Madurai East Union, Madurai – 625 020. +1cc to Mr.S.Viswalingam, Advocate Sr.No.58285 +1cc to Spl.Government Pleader Sr.No.59032 VSN

¶36

VB/KKR/SAR3/11.04.2018/4P/9C

¶37

W.P.(MD) No.12014 of 2011 and M.P(MD)Nos.2 and 3 of 2011 27.03.2018

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P. Selvi, v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P. Selvi, v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

H.Herold Joshua, Vs the Director of School

N. Florence, Vs the Secretary

Tmt. S. Savadammal, Vs the Director

I. Rajapushpam, Vs the Joint Director

M.Muneeswari, Vs the Director of Elementary-

T.Jeevananatham, Vs the Commissioner