The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on the hearing date, with no costs ordered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 05.02.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P(MD)No.11751 of 2011
M.Shanmuganathan
... Petitioner
Vs.
Head Office, Kumbakonam.
... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to settle his earned leave amount of Rs.63,541/- and Provident Fund amount of Rs.15,750/- to the Petitioner within a time frame.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.D.Sivaraman
ORDER
When the matter was taken up on 31.01.2018, none appeared on behalf of the writ petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption “For dismissal”.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (P&A)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
2
To
DSK
TE/GT/SAR-1 : 20/02/2018 : 2P/3C
ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.11751 of 2011 05.02.2018
M.Shanmuganathan
The Administrative Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
