Allowed

U.Sugumaran, S/O.Urangapuli v. the Principal Secretary

Madras HC22 Jan 2018WP(MD)/1150/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner an employee filed writ under Art 226 seeking direction to first respondent to dispose appeal dated 29.11.2017 within stipulated time. Court allowed petition directing first respondent to dispose appeal on or before 30.04.2018.

What did the court decide?

First respondent is directed to dispose of the writ petitioner's appeal dated 29.11.2017 on or before 30.04.2018. No costs.

U.Sugumaran, S/O.Urangapuli Vs the Principal Secretary — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Dated : 22.01.2018

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.1150 of 2018

¶7

U.Sugumaran .... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The Principal Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

¶10

2.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Department, Chennai-600 034. ... Respondents

¶11

Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to pass orders on the appeal dated 29.11.2017 preferred by the petitioner within the stipulated time.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Louis

¶13

For Respondents : Mr.M.Jeyakumar Additional Government Pleader

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

Mr.M.Jeyakumar, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. By consent of both parties, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing at the admission stage itself.

¶16

2.The writ petitioner is an employee in Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Virudhunagar. The second respondent imposed punishment of stoppage of increment for six months without cumulative effect vide order dated 15.10.2017. The writ petitioner has filed an appeal on 29.11.2017 questioning the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ same. The appeal is to be disposed of by the first respondent.

¶17

¶18

3.The first respondent is directed to dispose of the writ petitioner's appeal dated 29.11.2017 on or before 30.04.2018. This writ petition is allowed as indicated above. No costs.

¶19

Sd/Assistant Registrar(C.O.) /True Copy/

¶20

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶21

¶22

1.The Principal Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

¶23

2.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Department, Chennai-600 034.

¶24

+1CC to Mr.S.Louis, Advocate, SR.No. 43303

¶25

+1CC to the Special Government Pleader SR.No.43680

¶26

W.P(MD)No.1150 of 2018 22.01.2018

¶27

skm AM/SV MMS/SAR 4/01.02.2018/2P/5C

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

U.Sugumaran, S/O.Urangapuli v. the Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

U.Sugumaran, S/O.Urangapuli v. the Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Koodalingam, Vs the Joint Director (Personal)

H.Premkumar, S/O.Harikrishnan Vs the District Collector

P.Muthammal, Vs the Managing Director

A.Alexander, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

The General Manager Vs the Presiding Officer

B.Mareeswaran, S/O.Bagavathi Vs the Managing Director