Disposed

The Retired Officials v. the Chief Secretary

Madras HC24 Jan 2018WP(MD)/11187/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single judge order of the Madras High Court concludes a writ petition filed by retired employees' association seeking pension revisions. The court noted that the grievance was reconsidered and benefits granted during pendency, thereby closing the petition and a connected miscellaneous petition without a separate adjudication from this bench.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition and connected miscellaneous petition were closed without any order as to costs.

The Retired Officials Vs the Chief Secretary — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 24.01.2018

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶6

W.P(MD)No.11187 of 2011 and MP(MD)No.2 of 2011

¶7

The Retired Official Association, Madurai Branch, Represented by its President, V.Jayaraman,

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

The Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai.

¶11

The Principle Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai.

¶12

The District Collector, Madurai Distrit, Madurai. ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the 3^rd respondent made in Roc.No.E7/19076/2011, dated 03.09.2011 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents 2 & 3 to grant benefits to the retired employees in the cadre of Tahsildars, Block Development Officers, Inspectors of Police and Forest Rangers based on the G.O.Ms.No.71 Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 26.02.2011.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Suresh Kumar For Respondents : Mr.R.Sethuraman, Special Government Pleader

¶15

ORDER

¶16

The relief sought for in this writ petition is to direct the respondents to grant benefits to the retired employees in the cadre of Tahsildars, Block Development Officers, Inspectors of Police and Forest Rangers based on the G.O.Ms.No.71 Finance (Pay Cell) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Department, dated 26.02.2011.

¶17

¶18

2.During the pendency of the writ petition, the grievance of the writ petitioner was reconsidered and the benefits in respect of the revision of pension also has been granted. Thus, no further adjudication needs to be undertaken in this writ petition.

¶19

3.Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed. However, there shall be no orders as to costs. Consequently, MP(MD)No.2 of 2011 is closed.

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

Assistant Registrar (AS)

¶22

/True Copy/

¶23

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶24

¶25

The Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai.

¶26

The Principle Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai.

¶27

The District Collector,

¶28

Madurai Distrit, Madurai.

¶29

- 1 CC TO Mr.M.SURESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 44058 + 1 CC TO SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER IN SR No. 44336

¶30

DSK

¶31

TE/MR/SAR-2 : 07/02/2018 : 2P/6C

¶32

ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.11187 of 2011 and MP(MD)No.2 of 2011 24.01.2018

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Retired Officials v. the Chief Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Retired Officials v. the Chief Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Vella Pandian, Vs the Registrar of Co-Operative

B. Vaikundam Vs the Superintending Engineer

P.Azhagar, Vs the Executive Officer

Kremmer Sandegren Foundation Vs the District Registrar

S. Balasubramanian Vs the Union of India

V.Geetha Vs the Joint Director of School