Allowed

P.Vijayalakshmi, v. The District Collector

Madras HC4 Dec 2018WP/9949/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged non-action on her representation regarding land dispute by direction to third respondent. Court ordered third respondent to consider the representation, issue notices, and conduct a proper hearing with due opportunity to all parties within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Third respondent directed to consider representation dated 01.02.2018, issue notices, and conduct a hearing within four weeks.

P.Vijayalakshmi, Vs The District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 04.12.2018

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA

¶5

W.P.No.9949 of 2018

¶6

P.Vijayalakshmi .. Petitioner
Vs.
1. The District Collector,
Kanchipuram, Kanchipuram District.
2. The Superintendent of Police,
Kanchipuram, Kanchipuram District.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Kanchipuram, Kanchipuram District.
4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Kooduvancheri Police Station,
Kanchipuram.
5. The Tahsildar,
Chengalpet Taluk,
Kanchipuram District.
6. The Inspector of Police,
Kooduvanchery Police Station,
Kanchipuram, Kanchipuram District.
7. The Sub Registrar,
Sub Registrar Office,
Kooduvanchery, Kanchipuram District.
8. The Village Administrative Officer,
Nandhivaram Village, Kooduvanchery,
Kanchipuram District.

¶7

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶8

G.Thiruvakku.

10.D.Perumalsami

11.R.Ragavan

.. Respondents

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to conduct the enquiry which has been based on the petitioner's representation to the respondents on 01.02.2018.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Senthamizh Selvan For Respondents-1 to 8 : Mr.E.Balamurugan Special Government Pleader For Respondent-9 : Mr.Edwinsoloman For Respondent-10 : Mr.N.Vanaraj For Respondent-11 : Mr.A.Ramalingam O R D E R

¶14

The petitioner has come up with this Writ Petition seeking a direction to the third respondent to conduct the enquiry based on her representation dated 01.02.2018.

¶15

According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner has submitted a representation dated 01.02.2018 seeking to take necessary action against the respondents 9 to 11 with regard to land dispute and to recover the land, but the same is yet to be disposed of by the third respondent.

¶16

Heard Mr.E.Balamurugan, learned Special Government Pleader on behalf of the respondents 1 to 8, Mr.Edwinsolomon, learned counsel on behalf of the ninth respondent, Mr.N.Vanaraj, learned counsel on behalf of the tenth respondent and Mr.A.Ramalingam, learned counsel on behalf of the eleventh respondent.

¶17

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made on either side, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the representation, directs the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.02.2018 and pass appropriate orders, on

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

merits and in accordance with law, after issuing notice to the petitioner and the respondents 9 to 11 herein and also affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, respondents 9 to 11 herein as well as any of the interested parties, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶20

With the above directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

¶21

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CO)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Srn
To
1. The District Collector,
Kanchipuram, Kanchipuram District.
2. The Superintendent of Police,
Kanchipuram, Kanchipuram District.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Kanchipuram, Kanchipuram District.
4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Kooduvancheri Police Station,Kanchipuram.
5. The Tahsildar,
Chengalpet Taluk, Kanchipuram District.
6. The Inspector of Police,
Kooduvanchery Police Station,
Kanchipuram, Kanchipuram District.
7. The Sub Registrar,
Sub Registrar Office,
Kooduvanchery, Kanchipuram District.

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

The Village Administrative Officer, Nandhivaram Village, Kooduvanchery, Kanchipuram District.

¶24

+1cc to Mr.M.Senthamizh Selvan, Advocate, S.R.No.83968 +1cc to Mr.N.Vanaraj, Advocate, S.R.No.83775

¶25

+1cc to Mr.R.Edwin Solomon, Advocate, S.R.No.83528
+1cc to Mr.A.Ramalingam, Advocate, S.R.No.83527
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.84018
W.P.No.9949 of 2018
KAN(CO)
GSP(19/12/2018)

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Vijayalakshmi, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Vijayalakshmi, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.P. Selvam, Vs The Joint -1 Sub Registrar

Mrs.S.Rema @ S.Rema Asley Vs The District Collector

C.Nanjappan, Vs The District Collector

V.Munusamy, Vs The Senior Regional Manager

Annaiyappa, Vs The District Revenue Officer

Mr.N.Mohan Vs The District Collector