Disposed

The Management, Cri Pumps v. The Presiding Officer

Madras HC5 Jun 2018WP/9834/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras closed multiple writ petitions challenging orders of the Industrial Tribunal. The court accepted a joint memo from parties stating the issues were settled, leading to the closure of the petitions and connected miscellaneous petitions without adjudication.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions and connected miscellaneous petitions closed; no order as to costs.

The Management, Cri Pumps Vs The Presiding… — Labour and Industrial Disputes | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED :05.06.2018

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶5

W.P.Nos.9834 of 2017 to 9839 of 2017 and W.M.P.Nos.10821 to 10826 of 2017 and W.P.Nos.16257 of 2017 and 16258 of 2017

¶6

The Management CRI Pumps Private Limited Rep. by its Chief Financial Officer K.Srinivasa Raghavan, No.122-B, Athipalayam Road, Chinnavedampatti, Ganapathy, Coimbatore - 641 006. ...Petitioner in W.P.Nos.9834 to 9839 of 2017 Vs. 1.The Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal, Chennai.

¶7

2.Covai Maavatta Puthiya Jananayaga Thozhilalar Munnani, No.137, I Floor, K.R.R.Complex, Thadagam Salai, KRG Pudur, Coimbatore - 641 108. ...Respondents in W.P.Nos.9834 to 9839 of 2017

¶8

Covai Maavatta Puthiya Jananayaga Thozhilalar Munnani Rep. by General Secretary K.R.RComplx Thadagam Road KNG.Puthur, Coimbatore- 641 025. ...Petitioner in W.P.No.16257 & 16258 of 2017 Vs

¶9

1 The Presiding Officer Tamil Nadu Industrial Tribunal Chennai-104

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

2 The Management C.R.I.Pumps Pvt Ltd Chinnavedampatti Ganapathy, Coimbatore- 641 006. ...Respondents in W.P.Nos.16257 and 16258 of 2017

¶12

Prayer in W.P.Nos.9834 to 9839 of 2017:

¶13

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the first respondent in I.A.Nos.10/207,11/2017,6/2017,7/2017,12/2017, and 13/2017 in I.D.Nos.47/2015,47/2015,16/2014,16/2014,42/2014 and 42 of 2014 respectively and quash its order dated 07.04.2017.

¶14

Prayer in W.P.Nos.16257 and 16258 of 2017:

¶15

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the entire records of the 1st respondent connected with the order in I.A. Nos.8 & 9 of 2017 and 1 & 2 of 2016 in I.D. No.36 of 2014 and 3 of 2016 respectively dated 07.04.2017 and quash the same and further directed the 1st respondent to adjudicate the industrial dispute in I.D. No.36 of 2014 and 3 of 2016.

¶16

For Respondents : R1-Tribunal M/s.A.Suresh Sakthi Murugan for R2.

¶17

C O M M O N O R D E R

¶18

The respective learned counsel appearing for both the respondents and the petitioner filed a joint memo in W.P.Nos.9834 of 2017 to 9839 of 2017 dated 10.04.2018 stating that all the issues involving in these writ petitions are settled between the parties concerned. In view of the above submission, no further adjudication needs to be entertained in these writ petitions.

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

Accordingly, these writ petitions are closed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. There is no order as to costs.

¶21

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS V)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The Presiding Officer
Industrial Tribunal,
Chennai.
+1cc to M/S.S.Bazeer Ahamed, Advocate Sr.34857
W.P.Nos.9834 of 2017 to 9839 of 2017
and W.M.P.Nos.10821 to 10826 of 2017
and W.P.Nos.16257 of 2017 and 16258 of 2017
cp[co]
srg 19/06/2018

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Management, Cri Pumps v. The Presiding Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Management, Cri Pumps v. The Presiding Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

H.Sivakumar, Vs Thiru. T. Vijayakumar

M. Gopal Vs Mr. Karthikeyan

Dr.J.Yogesh, Vs The Secretary

T. Subbiah, Vs Mr. Thenkasi S. Jawahar, I.A.S

S. Jamuna Vs Thiru. K.V. Muralidharan, IAS

Boiler Auxiliaries Project Vs Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd.