Disposed

S.Sivagami v. The Executive Engineer

Madras HC4 Apr 2018WP/7684/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court issued a writ of mandamus directing respondents managing the Parambikulam Aliyar Project to consider the petitioner's representation regarding free water supply to her agricultural land and take appropriate action within three weeks, disposing of the petition without going into merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider the pending representation and take appropriate action within three weeks.

S.Sivagami Vs The Executive Engineer — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 04.04.2018

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA

¶5

W.P.No.7684 of 2018

¶6

S.Sivagami .. Petitioner -vs-

¶7

1. The Executive Engineer PAP Aliyar Vadinila Division Udumalai Road, Pollachi Coimbatore District 2. The Assistant Executive Engineer PAP Aliyar Vadinila Division Udumalai Road, Pollachi Coimbatore District 3. The Assistant Engineer PAP Aliyar Vadinila Division Udumalai Road, Pollachi Coimbatore District 4. Periyakaliyappan 5. Chinna Kaliyappan 6. Nandhakumar .. Respondents

¶8

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.02.2018 for taking appropriate action to ensure the free supply of water to the petitioner's agricultural land measuring to an extent of 1.1.00 Hectares comprised in S.No.40/2 of Thondamuthur Village, Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore District through the Mathagu No.3 (Straight) South Madai No.1 from the Sub Water Channel 10.2000 irrigation division No.5, Parambikulam Aliyar Project without any interference by the respondents 4 to 6 herein.

¶9

For Petitioner :: Mr.V.Ravi For Respondents :: Mr.K.T.Devendran Additional Government Pleader for R1 to 3

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

ORDER

¶12

This writ petition has been filed seeking a mandamus to the respondents 1 to 3 herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.02.2018 for taking appropriate action to ensure the free supply of water to the petitioner's agricultural land measuring an extent of 1.1.00 Hectares comprised in Survey No.40/2 of Thondamuthur Village, Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore District through the Mathagu No.3 (Straight) South Madai No.1 from the Sub Water Channel 10.2000 Irrigation division No.5, Parambikulam Aliyar Project without any interference by the respondents 4 to 6 herein.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the owner of 1.1.00 Hectares of agricultural land covered in Survey No.40/2 of Thondamuthur Village, Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore District. The said land originally belonged to late Marimuthu Gounder and late Palanichamy Gounder, the petitioner's grandfather and father respectively and their legal heirs. The petitioner is also one of the legal heirs. When the said land is covered with irrigation facilities under the Parambikulam Aliyar Project Water Scheme, after distribution of water, which is also managed by the respondents 1 to 3, the petitioner's land is being cultivated. While so, the respondents 4 to 6 have damaged the water channel and also further prevented the free flow of water into her land. In this regard, a representation dated 27.2.2018 for taking appropriate action to ensure the free supply of water to the petitioner's agricultural land, as mentioned above, covered in Survey No.40/2 situated at Thondamuthur village, Pollachi Taluk has been given and the same has been pending for quite a long time. Now the time has come to supply the water. Therefore, a direction be issued so that the petitioner will be able to get the water to her land.

¶14

Although the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents 1 to 3 sought time to take instructions, this Court, considering the nature of prayer made by the petitioner, without going to the merits, hereby directs the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the pending representation of the petitioner and take appropriate action within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Consequently, W.M.P.No.9587 of 2018 is closed. No costs.

¶15

Sd/-

¶16

Assistant Registrar(CS II)

¶17

//True Copy//

¶18

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶19

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

¶22

The Executive Engineer
PAP Aliyar Vadinila Division
Udumalai Road, Pollachi
Coimbatore District
2. The Assistant Executive Engineer
PAP Aliyar Vadinila Division
Udumalai Road, Pollachi
Coimbatore District
3. The Assistant Engineer
PAP Aliyar Vadinila Division
Udumalai Road, Pollachi
Coimbatore District
+1 cc to Mr.V.Ravi Advocate sr 24795
+1 cc to the Government Pleader High court Madras
sr 25655
W.P.No.7684 of 2018
nrl(co)
aa06/04/2018

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Sivagami v. The Executive Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Sivagami v. The Executive Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

L.Karthik Gnanasekaran, Vs The Territory Manager (Lpg)

Sekar, Vs Bharat Electronics Ltd.

Mrs.Nirmala Devi Vs The Tahsildar

K.Raju, Vs The Assistant Commissioner

K.Pramila, Vs The Regional Manager

R.B.Pazhanivel Vs The Deputy Registrar