Allowed

Swamy Ayyappa Diesel Works v. The Sales Tax Officer

Madras HC21 Jun 2018WP/6769/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the writ petition and quashed the assessment order for tax defaults, directing the respondent to reopen the case applying specific tax rates and thresholds. The matter was remanded for reassessment and connected petitions dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner's writ petition allowed; impugned order set aside and remitted to respondent for reassessment at 0.5% and higher rates as applicable.

Swamy Ayyappa Diesel Works Vs The Sales Tax Officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 21.06.2018

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM

¶5

W.P.No.6769 of 2018 & W.M.P. No.8389 of 2018

¶6

Swamy Ayyappa Diesel Works Represented by its Partner K.L.Kumar

¶7

No.69, Kalarampatti Main Road Salem - 636 015 ...Petitioner

¶8

¶9

The Sales Tax Officer Salem Town (West) Assessment circle Salem ...Respondent

¶10

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records on the files of the respondent herein in Asst. No.33462823072/201112, dated 21.02.2018, and quashing the same.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Inbarajan For Respondent : Ms.G.Dhanamadhri

¶12

Govt. Advocate (Taxes)

¶13

ORDER

¶14

Mr.N.Inbarajan, learned appearing for the petitioner and Ms.G.Dhanamadhri, learned Government Advocate (Taxes), appearing for the respondent.

¶15

Learned counsel on either side agreed that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the earlier order of this court in the case of Tvl.Bawa Medicals v. The Commercial Tax Officer, Omalur Assessment Circle, Omalur made in WP.19262 & 19263 of 2017, dated 09.01.2018. The operative portion of the order reads as follows:-

¶16

"4. The provisions of the said Act, more particularly Section 3(4)(b), is clear that such

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

dealer may pay a tax for each year on his turnover relating to taxable goods upto Rs.50 lakhs at such rate not exceeding 1% (presently 0.5%) as may be notified by the Government and is liable to pay tax under Sub-Section (2) on all his sales of taxable goods above Rs.50 lakhs.

¶19

The said provision clearly shows that upto Rs.50 lakhs, the dealer is liable to be assessed at such rate not exceeding 0.5%. However, the respondent did not take note of the statutory provision and assessed the entire turnover at a higher rate of tax namely 5% and 14.5%. Thus, the impugned orders call for interference.

¶20

Accordingly, the writ petitions are allowed, the impugned orders are set aside and the matters are remanded to the respective respondent with a direction to assess the petitioners to tax at 0.5% for the turnover upto Rs.50 lakhs and over and above Rs.50 lakhs, at the rate of 5% and 14.5%. No costs. Consequently, the connected WMPs are closed."

¶21

Following the above order, the writ petition is allowed, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded to the respondent with a direction to assess the petitioner's to tax at 0.5% for the turnover upto Rs.50 lakhs and over and above Rs.50 lakhs, at the rate of 5% and 14.5%. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶22

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar Rj To The Sales Tax Officer Salem Town (West) Assessment circle,Salem

¶23

+1cc to Mr.N.Inbarajan, Advocate, S.R.No.39243 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.39688

¶24

W.P.No.6769 of 2018 & W.M.P. No.8389 of 2018

¶25

CS/29/06/18

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Swamy Ayyappa Diesel Works v. The Sales Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Swamy Ayyappa Diesel Works v. The Sales Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Giesecke & Devrient Ms Vs The Principal Commissioner of

Tvl.a.K. Trading Corporation Vs Assistant Commissioner(St)

M/s.Empress Audio, Vs The Assistant Commissioner

M/s.Adayar Gate Hotel Ltd. Vs The Commissioner of Customs

N.V. Kamalesh Kumar Vs Thirupalani

M/s.Mehler Engineered Products Vs The Union of India