Disposed

A.Stanislas Ex-Serviceman v. The Registrar

Madras HC18 Apr 2018WP/6598/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single judge of the Madras High Court dealt with a writ petition seeking a mandamus to direct the National Green Tribunal to correct a typographical error in an order by changing the cited writ petition number from 1137/2017 to 11237/2017. The Court directed the petitioner to file an amendment application before the Tribunal, which was to be forwarded to the Principal Bench for necessary correct

What did the court decide?

Directed the petitioner to file an application for amendment before the Green Tribunal, Southern Zone, which the Tribunal must forward to the Principal Bench for necessary correction of the order date

A.Stanislas Ex-Serviceman Vs The Registrar — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 18.04.2018

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU

¶7

Writ Petition No.6598 of 2018

¶8

A.Stanislas ...Petitioner

¶9

versus

¶10

The Registrar, National Green Tribunal, South Zone, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai. ...Respondent

¶11

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to issue a corrected order in A.No.98/2016 (S.Z) and A.No.106/2017 by correcting the writ petition number as 11237/2017 instead of 1137/2017 wherever it appears in the order dated 13.07.2017 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 19.12.2017.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Shanmugham for M/s. Shanmugha Asociates

¶13

For Respondent : Mr.B.Sasidaran

¶14

O R D E R (The Order of the Court was made by R.Subbiah,J.)

¶15

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondent to issue a corrected order in A.No.98/2016 (S.Z) and A.No.106/2017 by correcting the writ petition number as 11237/2017 instead of 1137/2017 wherever it appears in the order dated 13.07.2017, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 19.12.2017.

¶16

The petitioner is an Ex-serviceman. He filed an Application in A.No.106/2017 for permanent injunction restraining the authorities not to dispossess him from the land in Survey No.784/1, Neidhavoyal Village, Ponneri, Thiruvallur District. The Green Tribunal, Southern Zone, Chennai, has

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

disposed of the application in A.No.106/2017 along with the connected Application in A.No.98/2016, by order dated 13.07.2017, by referring the pendency of W.P.No.11237/2017. Subsequently, the said writ petition came to be disposed of this Court on 01.08.2017. While referring the case number in W.P.No.11237/2017 in the order dated 13.07.2017, the Green Tribunal Southern Zone, Chennai, due to typographical error, has referred the writ petition number as W.P.No.1137/2017. Since there is no Presiding Officers in the Green Tribunal, Southern Zone, Chennai, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking the relief as stated supra.

¶19

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

¶20

Considering the facts and circumstances, we direct the petitioner to file an application for amendment before the Green Tribunal, Southern Zone, Chennai, within a period of one week from today. On receipt of such application, the Green Tribunal, Southern Zone, Chennai, is directed to forward the same to the Green Tribunal, Principal Bench, within a period of one week thereafter, to pass appropriate orders to carry out necessary amendment in the order dated 13.07.2017 by the Principal Bench of Green Tribunal. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. s/dAssistant Registrar(CS VIII) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar vsi To The Registrar, National Green Tribunal, South Zone, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai. Writ Petition No.6598 of 2018 RK(CO) SP(20/04/2018)

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

A.Stanislas Ex-Serviceman v. The Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Stanislas Ex-Serviceman v. The Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravi Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

T.Veerappan Vs The Revenue Divisional officer

United India Insurance Vs Smt M. Renuka

Rajeswari Vs Balakumar

R. Srinivasan Vs P. Rajan

P.Murugan, Vs the State Human Rights