The Hon'ble Court dismissed the Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution as infructuous, having recorded the petitioner's counsel's endorsement to that effect.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 12.12.2018
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
W.P.No.6066 of 2014
and
M.P.No. 1 of 2014
Rizmiya ... Petitioner
Vs
1. The Government of Tamil Nadu,
Rep. By its Secretary,
Home Department,
Fort St.George, Chennai.
2. The Director,
Institute of Mental Health,
Kilpauk, Chennai-10.
3. M/s. Axfort Mental Health Home,
Urapakkam, Kancheepuram District.
4. Kaja Mohideen ... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner grievance and in particularly third and fourth respondents to pay compensation to the petitioner as sum of Rs.20,00,000/-. For Petitioner : Mr. P.Vijendran For Respondent : Mr.V.Prabhu Government Advocate For R1 & R2 O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in the writ petition has become
infructuous and hence the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
mrp
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1. The Secretary,
Home Department,
Fort St.George, Chennai.
2. The Director,
Institute of Mental Health,
Kilpauk, Chennai-10.
+1cc to The Govt. Pleader, Advocate, S.R.No.86733
W.P.No.6066 of 2014
and
M.P.No. 1 of 2014
EV(CO)
KAK(21/01/2019)
Rizmiya
The Government of Tamil Nadu
The Director, Institute of Mental Health
M/s. Axfort Mental Health Home
Kaja Mohideen
V.BHARATHIDASAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
