Writ petitioner sought permission for a demonstration via mandamus; counsel moved to withdraw before argument. The Court allowed withdrawal without substantive decision on the merits.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed with liberty to file fresh application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:07.03.2018 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH W.P.No.5047 of 2018
N.Jayavel ..Petitioner Vs 1.The Superintendent of Police, Kanchipuram, Kanchipuram District. 2.The Inspector of Police, G-4, Police Station, Chiyure Police Station, ..Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to consider the representation dated 27.02.2018 made by the petitioner and direct the respondents to give a permission and protection to contest demonstration.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vellidoss For Respondents: Mr.D.Raja, Additional Government Pleader O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned Police Station by making a fresh application, seeking for necessary permission. Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar nl
To
N. Jayavel
Superintendent of Police, Kanchipuram
Inspector of Police, G-4, Police Station, Chiyure
M.S. Ramesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
