Two writ petitions were dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner had endorsed prayers that they have become infructuous, foregoing the court's need to adjudicate the substantive claims regarding disclosure statements and opportunity to comment.
Writ petitions dismissed as infructuous with no costs awarded to the respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.06.2018
C O R A M
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
W.P.Nos.46696 & 46697 of 2002
W.P.No.46696 of 2002
Sree Karpagambal Mills Ltd.
Regd. Office: Cholapuram, South P.O.
Near Rajapalayam 626 139
Virudhunagar District, Tamil Nadu
Rep by its Managing Director ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.Union of India through its Secretary
Ministry of Finance,
Government of India, New Delhi - 110 011.
2.Directorate General of Anti-dumping and
Allied Duties, through its Designated Authority
Government of India, Ministry of Commerce
and Industry, Department of Commerce
Udyog Bhavan, New Delhi - 110 011.
3.Reliance Industries Limited
Makers Chambers-IV, 222, Nariman Point
Mumbai - 400 021, through its
Managing Director
4.Indo Rama Synthetics (I) Limited
51A, Industrial Area, Dist. Dhar
Pithampur (M.P.) through its
Managing Director ... Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the disclosure statement issued by the 2nd respondent in proceeding No.22/1/2001-DGAD dated 03.12.2002, quash the same.
W.P.No.46697 of 2002 Sree Karpagambal Mills Ltd. Regd. Office: Cholapuram, South P.O. Near Rajapalayam 626 139 Virudhunagar District, Tamil Nadu
Rep by its Managing Director ... Petitioner
Vs.
3.Reliance Industries Limited Makers Chambers-IV, 222, Nariman Point Mumbai - 400 021, through its Managing Director
4.Indo Rama Synthetics (I) Limited 51A, Industrial Area, Dist. Dhar Pithampur (M.P.) through its Managing Director ... Respondents
Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to disclose all essential facts particularly those set out in para 27 the affidavit filed in support of the petition and to provide the petitioners adequate opportunity to comment/respond to the same before proceeding to make its final findings.
For Petitioner : Mr.Karthik Rajan [in both WPs] For R4 : Mr.D.Balaraman [in both WPs] O R D E R
Mr.Karthik Rajan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayers sought for in these writ petitions by the petitioner have become infructuous and also made the following endorsement:
"W.P.Nos.46696 and 46697 of 2002 have become infructuous and hence it can be dismissed"
2.In view of the submission and also the endorsement made in the petitions, these writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
maya
sm:26.6.2018
W.P.Nos.46696 & 46697 of 2002
Sree Karpagambal Mills Ltd.
Union of India
Directorate General of Anti-dumping and Allied Duties
Reliance Industries Limited
Indo Rama Synthetics (I) Limited
P.D. Audikesavalu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
