Partly allowed

swaminathan v. The Secretary to Government

Madras HC26 Feb 2018WP/4127/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court held the procedure under Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline & Appeal) Rules and directed the first respondent to pass final orders on the long-pending disciplinary proceedings within one month and settle the petitioner's retirement benefits.

What did the court decide?

Directed the first respondent to pass final orders on merits within one month from the date of receipt of the order copy.

swaminathan Vs The Secretary to Government — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 26.02.2018

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA

¶5

W.P.No.4127 of 2018

¶6

Swaminathan S/o Sankara Narayanan .. Petitioner -vs-

¶7

The Secretary to Government Health and Family Welfare Department Fort St.George Chennai 600 009 2. The Director of Medical & Rural Health Services Chennai 600 006 3. The Joint Director of Medical Rural Health Services & Family Welfare Hospital Kumbakonam .. Respondents

¶8

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to complete the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner pending on the file of the third respondent in Na.Ka.No.2781/CM/2006 dated 16.05.2006, Ref.No.28788/SC/2006 dated 08.09.2007 and R.C.No.2781/SC/2006 dated 09.01.2018 within a reasonable time and further direct the respondents to settle the retirement benefits of the petitioner within a reasonable time.

¶9

For Petitioner :: Mr.T.Ayngaraprabhu For Respondents:: Mr.R.P.Prathap Singh Government Advocate ORDER

¶10

The petitioner, while serving as an Audio Metrician in the Government Headquarters Hospital, Kumbakonam, was subjected to face the disciplinary proceedings and consequently he was imposed with the punishment of stoppage of increment for one year with cumulative effect on 23.1.2007 by the Joint Director of Medical Rural Health Services & Family Welfare Hospital, Kumbakonam, the third respondent herein. But the said order was reviewed by the Head of the Department, the second respondent herein and finding certain infirmities/flaws in the order dated https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

23.1.2007, cancelled the same on 8.9.2017. After cancelling the order of punishment dated 23.1.2007, to rectify the defects, the case was directed to be taken up for revision under Rule 36 of the Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline & Appeal) Rules within a period of six months by the Head of the Department. Since the period of six months also got expired, the Head of the Department had no power to take up the revision, as the Government is the authority to proceed further in the matter, and finally the petitioner was also allowed to retire from service on 9.1.2018 with effect from 31.12.2006. Now the Government has not pass final order being the competent authority. Finding no such order having been passed, he has come to this Court seeking a mandamus to the respondents for quick disposal of the pending disciplinary proceedings.

¶12

The learned Government Advocate, taking notice on behalf of the respondents, sought three months' time to consider and pass appropriate orders.

¶13

As the petitioner reached the age of superannuation on 31.12.2006 and the departmental proceeding is pending for a period of more than ten long years almost against him, this Court directs the first respondent to pass appropriate final orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

¶14

Sd/Deputy Registrar(CS) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ss To

¶15

The Secretary to Government Health and Family Welfare Department Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009 2. The Director of Medical & Rural Health Services Chennai 600 006 3. The Joint Director of Medical Rural Health Services & Family Welfare Hospital Kumbakonam + 1 cc to Mr.Muthappan, Advocate Sr.14708 + 1 cc to Government Pleader Sr.14786 W.P.No.4127 of 2018 (CS-DR) EU(16/03/2018 )

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

swaminathan v. The Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

swaminathan v. The Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Ganesan Vs Thiru.Pradeep Yadav, I.A.S.

M.Alim Basha, Vs The Management of Bharat

N.R.Kapali, Vs M/s.Metropolitan Transport

J.Sathyamoorthy, Vs The Secretary to Government

T.Durairaj, Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

Mrs.K.Suganthi Bala, Vs Additional Assistant