Disposed

N.Elumalai, Advocate v. The Secretary to Government

Madras HC17 Jan 2018WP/371/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226 read with PIL principles, the Madras High Court directed the Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board to immediately remove trees and bushes growing on the Tiruvallikeni (Thiru.Vi.Ka.) Bridge to prevent damage to water supply pipelines and ensure bridge safety within two months.

What did the court decide?

Directing the third respondent to forthwith take steps for removal of trees and bushes on the Thiru.Vi.Ka. Bridge within two months from the date of communication of the order.

N.Elumalai, Advocate Vs The Secretary to… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 17.01.2018 CORAM THE HON'BLE MS. INDIRA BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶2

W.P.No.371 of 2018

¶3

N.Elumalai, Advocate S/o.M.Narayanan having chambers at No.397 New Additional Law Chambers High Court Buildings Chennai - 600 104. .. Petitioner Vs. 1 The Secretary to Government Public Works Department Government of Tamil Nadu Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

¶4

2 The Executive Engineer Bridges Department Greater Chennai Corporation Chennai-3.

¶5

3 The Chief Engineer (Operation and Maintenance) Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board (CMWSSB), Chindatripet, Chennai-2. .. Respondents

¶6

PRAYER: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the 3^rd respondent to implement the directions of the 2^nd respondent dated 21.11.2017 within a stipulated time.

¶7

For Petitioner : Mr.F..Jenaldesrome For Respondents : Mr.E.Manoharan

¶8

Addl. Government Pleader for respondents 1 and 2 Mr.N.Ramesh for 3rd respondent

¶9

ORDER

¶10

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

¶11

Mr.E.Manoharan, learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the Respondent Nos.1 and 2.

¶12

Mr.N.Ramesh, learned counsel accepts notice on

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

behalf of the Respondent No.3.

¶15

This writ petition by way of public interest litigation has been filed by an Advocate seeking a writ of mandamus and/or directions directing the third respondent to remove unwanted trees which have grown on Thiru.Vi.Ka. Bridge across the River Adyar.

¶16

It is the case of the petitioner that there are water supply pipelines running on the said bridge. Unfortunately, the bridge has not been properly maintained and many unwanted trees have grown, which could damage the pipes running along the bridge and disrupt the water supply system.

¶17

Our attention has been drawn to a letter from the Executive Engineer, Bridges Department, Greater Chennai Corporation to the Respondent No.3, being the Chief Engineer (Operation and Maintenance) of the Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board, wherein it is stated that the trees and bushes are posing a danger to the life of the bridge and if their growth is not controlled and those which have grown are not removed, the bridge will get further weakened and in the event of the bridge collapsing, the water pipelines will also get damaged causing inconvenience to the people.

¶18

Mr.E.Manoharan, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 and 2 submits that Thiru.Vi.Ka. Bridge has been handed over to the Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board and is under the control of the third respondent.

¶19

The writ petition is disposed of by directing the third respondent to forthwith take steps for removal of the trees and bushes on the Thiru.Vi.Ka. Bridge, on which the water pipelines also run. The trees will positively be removed within two months from the date of communication of this order. No costs. Consequently, W.M.P.No.428 of 2018 is closed.

¶20

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶21

sasi

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

To:

¶24

1 The Secretary to Government Public Works Department Government of Tamil Nadu Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

¶25

2 The Executive Engineer
Bridges Department
Greater Chennai Corporation
Chennai-3.
3 The Chief Engineer (Operation and Maintenance)
Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and
Sewerage Board (CMWSSB),
Chindatripet,Chennai-2.
+1CC to Mr.N.Elumalai, Advocate S.R.No.3771
+1CC to Mr.N.Ramesh, Advocate S.R.No.3763
+1CC to Government Pleader S.R.No.3628
W.P.No.371 of 2018
MRR(03/02/2018)

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

N.Elumalai, Advocate v. The Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N.Elumalai, Advocate v. The Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Bhupathi, Vs The Director of Town

V.Jegannatha Chettiar Vs Kasthuri Ammal

V.Ramasamy Vs Thirumutrhy

M. Sundaram Vs The District Collector

V.Kanniappan Vs The District Collector/

V.Munikrishnan Vs The State of Tamil nadu.