Cable Tv Operators Social v. the Chairman
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court directed the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the Managing Director. Upon compliance, the respondent must consider the representation and pass orders after giving parties an opportunity within eight weeks.
What did the court decide?
Direction to petitioner to submit fresh representation within two weeks; respondent to consider it and pass orders within eight weeks thereafter.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.02.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
WP.No.35034 of 2013
& M.P.No.1 of 2013
Cable TV Operators Social Welfare Association, Rep. by its President Mr.K.Sellapandiyan ...Petitioner Vs
- The Chairman,
Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited,
11/22, Mangadu Sami St.,
Nungambakkam, Chennai -34.
- The Managing Director,
Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited,
11/22, Mangadu Sami St.,
Nungambakkam, Chennai -34.
- The Special Tahsildar / Deputy Manager, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited, Thiruvannamalai District,
Thiruvannamalai. ...Respondents
PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to give signals to the members of the petitioner association from the Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited Digital Control Room, Vellore.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a fresh representation must be submitted by the petitioner before considering the merits of the petition directing issuance of signals by the corporate body.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Cable TV Operators Social Welfare Association
- respondent
The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited
- respondent
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited
- respondent
The Special Tahsildar / Deputy Manager, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court