Disposed

Ambayiram, v. The Revenue Tahsildar

Madras HC14 Feb 2018WP/3173/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking mandamus to direct Revenue authorities to survey and lay boundaries to the petitioner's house site land. Court disposed of the petition without expressing views on merits, directing respondents to consider the application and pass orders on merits within 12 weeks after hearing all claimants.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to consider the petitioner's application dated 02.01.2018 and pass orders on merits within 12 weeks by hearing all claimants.

Ambayiram, Vs The Revenue Tahsildar — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 14.02.2018

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU

¶5

W.P.No.3173 of 2018

¶6

1.Ambayiram W/o.Mayavan

¶7

2.Devendran (minor)
S/o.Manikandan
Represented by his natural guardian
Manikandan, father

¶8

.. Petitioners
Vs.
1.The Revenue Tahsildar
Kallakurichi Taluk
Villupuram District.
2.The Surveyor
Thiyagadurgam Pirca
Kallakurichi Taluk
Villupuram District. ... Respondents

¶9

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to immediately survey and lay boundaries to the house site land of the 2nd petitioner bearing S.No.302/9 to an extent of 0.0.34 sq.meter, approximately 3/4th cent, 371.75 sq.ft in Patta No.545, Vadatherasalur Village, Kallakurichi Taluk, Villupuram District, as per the application given by the 1st petitioner dated 02.01.2018.

¶10

For Petitioners: Mr.S.Venkatesh

¶11

For Respondents : Mr.E.Balamurugan Additional Government Pleader O R D E R

¶12

Mr.E.Balamurugan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. By consent of the parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶13

Heard both sides.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

The petitioners seek for a mandamus directing the respondents to consider the application given by the first petitioner dated 02.01.2018, wherein and whereby, she sought for survey of the land in respect of the subject matter land.

¶16

The grievance of the petitioners before this Court is that the said application has not been considered so far. This Court, at this stage, is not expressing any view on the merits of the claim made by the petitioners, as it is for the respondents to consider and decide the same on merits and in accordance with law. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of, only by directing the respondents to consider the application of the first petitioner dated 02.01.2018 and pass orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioners as well as other rival claimants, if any. Such exercise shall be done by the respondents within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶17

Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (CS VIII)
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
mk
To
1.The Revenue Tahsildar
Kallakurichi Taluk
Villupuram District.
2.The Surveyor
Thiyagadurgam Pirca
Kallakurichi Taluk
Villupuram District.
+ 1 cc to Mr.S.Venkatesh Advocate,SR.11119
+ 1 cc to The Govt.Pleader, SR.11782
W.P.No.3173 of 2018
nr 05/03/2018

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Ambayiram, v. The Revenue Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ambayiram, v. The Revenue Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Poongavanam, Vs The District Collector

M/s.Savitha Devi Vs The Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies

J.Krishnakumar, Vs The Sub Collector

J.Krishnakumar, Vs The Commissioner

A.Senthil, Vs Inspector of Police

R.Sasikumar, Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer