Disposed

M/s.Sri Muruga Hardwares, v. The Assistant Commissioner

Madras HC2 Jan 2018WP/31363/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of writ petitions challenging TNVAT assessment orders. It allowed the petitioner one opportunity to substantiate their case by paying 15% of disputed tax, after which they could approach the Assessing Officer for a personal hearing and reassessment, pending which no coercive action would be taken.

What did the court decide?

Directed petitioner to pay 15% of disputed tax within three weeks to avail chance to present objections to Assessing Officer for rehearing and re-assessment; no coercive action pending.

M/s.Sri Muruga Hardwares, Vs The Assistant Commissioner — Income Tax | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 02.01.2018 CORAM:

¶3

THE HON'BLE Mr.Justice T.S.Sivagnanam

¶4

W.P.Nos.31363 to 31365 of 2017 and W.M.P.Nos.34459 to 34464 of 2017

¶5

M/s Sri Muruga Hardwares, represented by its Partner - K.Murugan

¶6

The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Tiruvannamalai-I Circle, Tiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai District.

¶7

... Respondent in all three WPs

¶8

Prayer in all W.Ps

¶9

WRIT Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records on the file of the respondent in his impugned proceedings made in TIN No.33104662972/2013-14, 2014-15 and 2016-17 dated 28.09.2017 and to quash the same as illegal and contrary to the scheme of the Act.

¶10

For Respondent : Mr.S. Kanmani Annamalai in all three WPs Additional Government Pleader

¶11

COMMON ORDER

¶12

Heard Mr.S.Rajasekar, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.S. Kanmani Annamalai, the learned Additional Government Pleader, accepting notice on behalf of the respondents. With consent on either side, these Writ Petitions are taken up for disposal.

¶13

The petitioner, who is a registered dealer on the file of the respondent, under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 (hereinafter, referred to as 'TNVAT Act'),

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

has filed these Writ Petitions, challenging the orders of assessment passed under the provisions of the TNVAT Act for the assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2016-17, respectively, dated 28.09.2017.

¶16

Though the respondent issued revision notices, the petitioner did not file their objections. Therefore, the respondent cannot be faulted for having confirmed the proposals in the revision/show cause notices. However, considering the fact that the assessment orders have been passed in September, 2017, and till date, no recovery could be made by the respondent and also owing to the fact that the alleged wilfull suppression of purchases and corresponding sales turnover is based on the information culled out from the Department Website and also based upon the Enforcement Wing Officers' report, this Court is inclined to give one opportunity to the petitioner to go before the Assessing Officer to substantiate their case.

¶17

Accordingly, these Writ Petitions are disposed of, by directing the petitioner to pay 15% of the disputed tax for each of the assessment years, and such payment shall be effected within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the petitioner complies with this condition, then, they will be entitled to treat the impugned assessment orders as show cause notices, and submit their objections within 15 days thereafter, enclosing all relevant records to fortify their claim. After the objections are received in full form, the respondent shall fix a date for personal hearing of the authorized representative of the petitioner, verify the records and redo the assessment in accordance with law. Till the above exercise is completed, no coercive action shall be initiated against the petitioner for recovery of the balance tax and penalty, as quantified in the impugned assessment orders. It is made clear that, if the petitioner does not comply with the condition imposed by this Court, then, the respondent shall proceed further, pursuant to the impugned assessment orders in accordance with law.

¶18

In the result, all these Writ Petitions are disposed of, as stated supra. No costs. Consequently, connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶19

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶20

//True copy//

¶21

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶22

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

¶25

The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Tiruvannamalai-I Circle, Tiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai District.

¶26

+3cc to Mr.R.Hemalatha, Advocate SR.No.336 +3cc to Government Pleader SR.No.181

¶27

W.P.Nos.31363 to 31365 of 2017

¶28

NM(CO) GN(14/02/2018)

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/s.Sri Muruga Hardwares, v. The Assistant Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Sri Muruga Hardwares, v. The Assistant Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Narasimhalu Vs The Tamil Nadu State Marketing

M/s.Rapid Care Transcription Vs The Income Tax Officer

P.Anthony, Vs The Revenue Officer

M/sTablets (India) Ltd, Vs The Assistant Commissioner

M/s.Mahi Enterprises, Vs The Commissioner of Customs

East Coast Constructions & Vs Additional Commissioner