Arivazhagan, v. The Director of Adi Dravidar Welfare
Case brief
What is this about?
In this writ petition under Article 226, the petitioner, a government employee, sought arrears of salary based on a government order that was implemented after his appointment. The Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation and pass appropriate orders within a specific timeframe without delving into the merits.
What did the court decide?
The respondents are directed to consider the petitioner's representation and pass orders thereon within two weeks.