Dismissed

Aji v. The Deputy Superintedent of Police

Madras HC1 Nov 2018WP/27284/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Multiple writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by petitioners against the Deputy Superintendent of Police. The petitions challenged the order permitting Cr.P.C. Section 160 statement recording, venue of enquiry, and alleged harassment via detention. The petitioners sought withdrawal, which was granted, and all writ petitions were dismissed as withdrawn.

What the court decided

AI extract

Aji Vs The Deputy Superintedent of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 01.11.2018 CORAM

¶2

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU

¶3

W.P.Nos.27284, 27289, 27293, 27296, 27298, 27675, 27677, 27681, 27684, 27685 and 27688 of 2018

¶4

Aji ... Petitioner in WP.27284/2018 Raj Dev ... Petitioner in WP.27289/2018 M.Satish ... Petitioner in WP.27293/2018 Siva @ Siva Prasad ... Petitioner in WP.27296/2018 Devendiran ... Petitioner in WP.27298/2018 K.Prakash ... Petitioner in WP.27675/2018 V.Rajesh ... Petitioner in WP.27677/2018 Ranjith Sanwal ... Petitioner in WP.27681/2018 Arun Christy ... Petitioner in WP.27684/2018 K.Senthil Vinayagam ... Petitioner in WP.27685/2018 N.Dayanidhi Swain ... Petitioner in WP.27688/2018 Vs

¶5

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Idol Wing CID, Guindy, Chennai- 600 032. ...

¶6

... Respondent in all WP's

¶7

Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to (a)issue an order or direction permitting the petitioners to be accompanied at all times by a lawyer as and when the petitioners are issued notice under Section 160 Cr.P.C for recording their statement; (b) to issue an order or direction to change the venue of enquiry from Kumbakonam to Chennai; and (c) issue an order or direction to the respondent not to harass the petitioners by the way of illegal detention and wrongful confinement.

¶8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶9

For Petitioners : Mr.Shanmugasundaram, SC for N.Balaji

¶10

For Respondent : Mr.P.Kirthika Kamal, GA(Crl.Side)

¶11

COMMON ORDER

¶12

The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these writ petitions. An endorsement to that effect has also been made by the learned counsel on record for the petitioners. In view of the same, all the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

¶13

Sd/-
Deputy Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Idol Wing CID,
Guindy,
Chennai- 600 032.
W.P.Nos.27284, 27289, 27293, 27296, 27298, 27675, 27677,
27681, 27684, 27685 and 27688 of 2018
nr 28/11/2018

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Aji v. The Deputy Superintedent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Aji v. The Deputy Superintedent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Senthil Vinayagam Vs Dy Sup of Po Guindy Ch

Sakthivel, Vs the State Rep by Its

Yuganathan Vs Iop Idol Wing Cid., Guindy, Ch

Saranraj@Vellai Vs State by

Musthafa Vs Iop Idol Wing CID Guindy Ch

Venu Srinivasan, 66 Years, Vs the State Rep by Its