Disposed

M/S.Roverco Apparel Company v. the Joint Commissioner of

Madras HC4 Jun 2018WP/27196/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a single-paragraph order closing a writ petition filed by a private limited company seeking a stay of income tax demand. Counsel agreed the CIR(A) had passed final orders, leading the court to close the petition and connected miscellaneous petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition Mp.No.1 of 2013 and connected miscellaneous petition were closed without costs.

M/S.Roverco Apparel Company Vs the Joint Commissioner of — Income Tax | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 04.06.2018

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM

¶6

W.P.No.27196 of 2013 &
M.P.No.1 of 2013
M/s. Roverco Apparel Company Private Limited
A Private Limited Company
Incorporated under the Provisions of the
Indian Companies Act, 1956
Represented by its Director
Mr.Harbinder Singh
No.37, TTK Road, Alwarpet
Chennai - 600 018. .. Petitioner
v.
1. The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax
Company Circle - V
No.121, Nungambakkam High Road
Chennai - 600 034
2. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Company Circle - V(4)
No.121, Nungambakkam High Road
Chennai - 600 034
3. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals- V)
No.121, Nungambakkam High Road
Chennai - 600 034 .. Respondents

¶7

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 1st

¶8

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶9

¶10

respondent in order C No. 9/13-14 PA No.AACCR4890A relating to the application made by the petitioner for stay of demand under section 220 (6) of the Income Tax Act 1961 and quash the order dated 20.9.2013 rejecting the stay petition and direct the 1st respondent to grant stay of demand relating to the assessment order for the assessment year 2010-11 pending disposal of the appeal before the 2nd respondent

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sivaraman For Respondents : Ms. Hema Muralikrishnan ORDER Learned counsel appearing on either side submitted that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has already passed final orders and therefore, the writ petition may be closed.

¶12

Recording the said submission made by the learned counsel on either side, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

04.06.2018

Index : Yes/No

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶17

¶18

¶19

The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax Company Circle - V No.121, Nungambakkam High Road Chennai - 600 034

¶20

The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Company Circle - V(4) No.121, Nungambakkam High Road Chennai - 600 034

¶21

Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals- V) No.121, Nungambakkam High Road Chennai - 600 034

¶22

http://www.judis.nic.in

T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J

W.P.No.27196 of 2013 &
M.P.No.1 of 2013

¶27

04.06.2018

¶28

http://www.judis.nic.in

M/S.Roverco Apparel Company v. the Joint Commissioner of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Roverco Apparel Company v. the Joint Commissioner of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s Empress Audio Vs Commissioner of Commercial

M/s. Vasan Health Care Pvt. Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner of

M/s.Kubhera Cable Pvt. Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner

M/S.Cosmopolitan Club Vs the Assistant Commissioner(Ct)

Dr.Y.Siva Arul Durai Vs Senior Intelligence Officer

K.Salar, Vs the General Manager (C.v.)