The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No.25386 of 2009 for non-prosecution as the petitioner filed no instructions and the petitioner's counsel was absent from the proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 25.10.2018
CORAM
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE S.VIMALA
W.P.NO.25386 of 2009
1.Indira
2.N.I.Sathyalakshmi
3.N.I.Anilkumar
.... Petitioners Vs
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the award dated 03.11.2005 made in I.D.No.60 of 2002 on the file of the Labour Court-Cum-Industrial Tribunal Chennai and quash the same and to direct the second respondent ie., Labour Court to restore the above said I.D. On its original file and to dispose of the same on merits within the stipulated time.
For Petitioner :Mr.R.Jaikumar for M/s.Fenn Walter Associates
For Respondents:Mr.N.G.R.Prasad – for R1 R2 – Labour Court
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner represents that there are no instructions from the petitioners. Learned counsel for the first respondent is present in the Court and has also filed a counter.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS IX)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
kst
To
+1cc to M/S.N.G.R.Prasad, Advocate Sr.73677
W.P.No.25386 of 2009
rr[co] srg 28/11/2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Indira
N.I.Sathyalakshmi
N.I.Anilkumar
The Assistant General Managr Indian Overseas Bank, R.O.Nagercoil
The Presiding Officer Central Government Labour Court-cum Industrial Tribunal, Shashtri Bhavan Chennai
Dr.Justice S.Vimala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
