Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

S.V. Naveen Balaji Vs The Secretary — Madras HC (2018) — LawSathi Research

Home
Madras HC
2018
S.V. Naveen Balaji Vs The SecretaryS.V. Naveen Balaji v. The Secretary

Dismissed

S.V. Naveen Balaji v. The Secretary

Madras HC22 Feb 2018WP/25223/2017

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:…

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22.02.2018

CORAM :

The Hon'ble Ms.INDIRA BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE,

The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH

AND

The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

W.P. No.25223 of 2017 S.V.Naveen Balaji .. Petitioner

-vs-

The Secretary,

Office of the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and

Puducherry, Bar Council Buildings,

(High Court Campus), Chennai 600 104. .. Respondent

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
S.V.Naveen Balaji
respondent
The Secretary, Office of the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry

Coram

AI extract

INDIRA BANERJEE

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 22 Feb 2018 · February
Registered: 19 Sept 2017
Case no.: WP/25223/2017

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from R.subbiah Abdul Quddhose

Ra.Thangarave Vs The Secretary
22 Feb 2018
D.Pavithra, Vs The Secretary
22 Feb 2018
S. Balasubramanian Vs The Secretary
22 Feb 2018

Cite this judgement

S.V. Naveen Balaji v. The Secretary, WP/25223/2017 (MAD), decided on 22 February 2018.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

INDIRA BANERJEE and R.SUBBIAH and ABDUL QUDDHOSE

Parties & counsel

Dismissed

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent ie. The Secretary, Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry, to enroll the petitioner herein as Advocate on the basis of the applicable provisions and the Rules of Legal Education, 2008 and consequently extend all benefits arising thereto.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Chandrasekaran For Respondent : Mr.S.Haja Mohideen Gisthi * * * * *

(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice)

Leave is given to the writ petitioner to withdraw the writ petition.

2.Learned counsel for the petitioner has also made an endorsement.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sra
To
The Secretary,
Office of the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and
Puducherry, Bar Council Buildings,
(High Court Campus), Chennai 600 104.
W.P.No.25223 of 2017
pvs(co)
aa20/03/2018

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.SUBBIAH

ABDUL QUDDHOSE

CNR

HCMA010732052017

Bench

R.subbiah Abdul Quddhose

Disposal

WITHDRAWN DISMISSED