4 The petitioner college submitted that they have uploaded all the required documents after rectifying the deficiencies. It is further stated that by 18.04.2018, the deficiencies were rectified as particularly the deficiency in faculty and library were rectified as per the compliance report. It is further stated that the equipments and books were also purchased by the petitioner and a detailed compliance report was also submitted on 25.04.2018 along with bills and vouchers containing the details of books and equipments purchased. It is stated by the petitioner that there is no deficiencies at all after rectification pointed out by the petitioner in the compliance report dated 25.04.2018. It is further stated that the first respondent all of a sudden vide communication dated 11.05.2018 informed that deficiencies in library and laboratory continued to exists in relation to B.Arch (Architecture) course and that therefore, the sanctioned intake of 40 is reduced to 30 for the academic year 2018-2019. It is further stated that the Council of Architecture by their proceedings dated 30.05.2018 granted Extension of Approval for the year 2018-2019 for a period of five years with its original intake of 40. Since, the first respondent has reduced the intake of 40 seats to 30 seats for the year 2018-2019 contrary to the proceedings of Council, the petitioner has approached this Court by stating that by grant of approval by the Council of Architecture vide proceedings dated 30.05.2018, proceedings of the first respondent dated 11.05.2018 should be deemed to be revoked. It is further stated that the compliance report submitted by the petitioner on 25.04.2018 was not at all considered by the first respondent while passing the impugned order. Therefore, raising further grounds, the above writ petition was filed by the petitioner.
