Dismissed

B.Ramadoss, v. The State Rep. by

Madras HC6 Sept 2018WP/23185/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to direct respondents to consider his representation regarding an election proposed for 25.08.2018. Court held the petition is infructuous as that election date has passed, though allow re-filing if new representation is made.

What did the court decide?

No costs awarded. Petitioner advised to make fresh representation if election was postponed.

B.Ramadoss, Vs The State Rep. by — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 06.09.2018

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR

W.P.No.23185 of 2018

B.Ramadoss

... Petitioner

Versus
1. The State Rep. by,
The District Collector,
Office of Collectorate,
Kancheepuram District.
2. The Commissioner,
Tamil Nadu State Co-operative Societies Election Commission,
No.273, Scheme Road,
Subbarayan Nagar,
Teynampet, Chennai.
3. The Joint Registrar,
Office of the Joint Registrar Co-Operative Society,
Office of Collectorate (Opposite),
Kancheepuram District.
4. The Deputy Registrar,
Office of the Deputy Co-Operative Society,
Azhagasan Street, Chengalpattu,
Kancheepuram District. .. Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of
Mandamus to direct the respondents to consider petitioner's
representation dated 20.08.2018 and contest the election with as
per the observation of the government official and received an
application from all interested candidate and contest the
election in accordance with law.

¶9

For Petitioner : M/s.S.Sugendran For Respondents: Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram, Spl.G.P., for RR1, 3 & 4 Mr.M.S.Palanisamy, for R2

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

This petition is filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to consider petitioner's representation dated 20.08.2018 and receive application from all interested candidates and contest the Election as per the observation of the Government Officials in accordance with law.

¶13

The learned counsel for the petitioner has given a representation dated 20.08.2018 stating that the Election proposed to be conducted on 25.08.2018, should be conducted in an appropriate manner and the entire proceedings of Election should be videographed.

¶14

The present Writ Petition is filed for issuing a direction to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 20.08.2018. Since the representation in respect of the Election which was proposed on 25.08.2018, no further action is now required on the said representation of the petitioner, dated 20.08.2018. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶15

At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the Election that was proposed to be conducted on 25.08.2018, was not conducted and that it was postponed. If that is true, it is open for the petitioner to make fresh representation, and if fresh representation is made, the respondents shall consider the same in accordance with law. No costs.

¶16

s/d-

¶17

Assistant Registrar(CS-V)

¶18

True Copy

¶19

Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶20

pvs

¶21

¶22

1.The District Collector, Office of Collectorate, Kancheepuram District.

¶23

The Commissioner,

¶24

Tamil Nadu State Co-operative Societies Election Commission, No.273, Scheme Road,

¶25

Subbarayan Nagar, Teynampet, Chennai.

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶27

The Joint Registrar,

¶28

Office of the Joint Registrar Co-Operative Society, Office of Collectorate (Opposite), Kancheepuram District.

¶29

The Deputy Registrar,

¶30

Office of the Deputy Co-Operative Society, Azhagasan Street, Chengalpattu, Kancheepuram District.

¶31

+1 CC to Mr.S. Sugendran, Advocate sr 61599.
+1 CC to Mr.L.P. Shanmuga Sundaram, Advocate sr 62212.
+1 CC to Govt. Pleader sr 62148
W.P.No.23185 of 2018
SR(CO)
SP(25/09/2018)

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

B.Ramadoss, v. The State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.Ramadoss, v. The State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Morning Star Centre Aided Vs The Director of Elementary

Grt Institute of Engineering & Vs The All India council for

R.B.Ajitha, Vs the Secretary

M.Thirumalai Selvam (Minor) Vs Union Of India

Miss. Taby Thomas, Vs the Tamil Nadu Dr. Mgr

R.Mohandass Vs The Commissioner