6.The Learned Counsel for the Petitioner contends that the State Government had issued orders in G.O.Ms.No.854, Revenue, dated 30.12.2006, wherein, the lands, which are set apart not for the common public use and at present, not in such utility, and used as house sites, wherein houses, which have been put up for more than 10 years, can be assigned to the persons, if proper documents are submitted to substantiate such use. Apart from that, the land which is in occupation and possession of the Petitioner and the surrounding area were developed as built up portions. Hence, it is represented on behalf of the Petitioner that there is no ambit for restoration of the said pond and even if the said pond is restored, no useful purpose will be served. Hence, the Petitioner made numerous Representations to the First Respondent/Collector, Thiruvallur District, seeking assignment of Patta in respect of the land in her possession. However, no endeavour was taken by the Authorities Concerned for issuance of Patta in her favour. Because of the reason that without issuance of Notice, the Authorities concerned had threatened the Petitioner to vacate the property, which is under her continuous enjoyment and possession for more than 43 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ years, the Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition.
