K.Raghavan, v. The State of Tamil Nadu
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition seeking declaration that land acquisition proceedings lapsed under Resettlement Act, 2013, dismissed for non-prosecution as petitioner was absent from both hearings.
Writ petition seeking declaration that land acquisition proceedings lapsed under Resettlement Act, 2013, dismissed for non-prosecution as petitioner was absent from both hearings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 18.12.2018 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN W.P. 22089 of 2018 and W.M.P. 25887 of 2018
K.Raghavan ... Petitioner
Vs
Adyar, Chennai-600 020.
PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Declaration, declaring that the land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, by issuing notification under section 4(1) of the Act in G.O.Ms.No.433, dated 14.5.1990, issuing declaration under section 6 of the Act in G.O.Ms.No.948, dated 7.6.1991 followed by passing of award in Award No.1/97 dated 23.4.1997 with respect to 1904 square feet of land comprised in S.No.617/1A3, belonging to the petitioner situated at Sholinganallor Village, Kancheepuram District, as lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and
Resettlement Act, 2013 (Act 30/2013), consequently forbear the 3rd respondent from taking further action pursuant to the notice dated 12.7.2018.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.D.Raja, Addl. Government Pleader for R1
Mr.Vivekavanan, Standing Counsel for R1, R3 & R4
O R D E R
When the above Writ Petition was posted for hearing on 11.12.2018, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, the matter was posted today “for dismissal”. Even today, (18.12.2018) there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner either in person or through the counsel on record. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rpp
To
1. The Secretary,
State of Tamil Nadu,
Housing and Urban Development
Department, Fort St. George,
Chennai-600 009.
2. The Managing Director,
Tamil Nadu Housing Board,
Nandanam, Chennai-600 009.
3. The Executive Engineer
and Administrative Officer,
Besant Nagar Division,
Tamil Nadu Housing Board Unit,
No.48, Dr.Muthulakshmi Road,
Adyar, Chennai-600 020.
W.P. 22089 of 2018 and W.M.P. 25887 of 2018
VGI(CO) GSP(10/01/2019)
K. Raghavan
The State of Tamil Nadu
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Housing Board
The Executive Engineer and Administrative Officer, Besant Nagar Division
The Special Tahsildar Land Acquisition
V. Bharathidasan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court