Disposed

Idbi Bank Limited, v. The District Magistrate-cum-

Madras HC1 Feb 2018WP/2043/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition under Article 226 prayed for mandamus to direct the District Magistrate-cum-Collector to dispose of an application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. The court directed disposal within three weeks considering statutory parameters.

What did the court decide?

Directed the District Magistrate-cum-Collector to dispose of the application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act within three weeks.

Idbi Bank Limited, Vs The District Magistrate-cum- — Banking and Recovery | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 01.02.2018

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

¶7

W.P.No.2043 of 2018

¶8

IDBI Bank Limited,

¶9

Rep. by its Authorised Officer, Shri Sanjay Kumar, ... Petitioner

¶10

vs.

¶11

The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Pondicherry. ... Respondent

¶12

WRIT Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to dispose of the application filed by the petitioner under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act on 05.01.2017 bearing File No.233/DRDM/C3/SARFAESI/2017 in accordance with law.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.Shivakumar

¶14

For Respondent : Mr.B.Nambiselvan

¶15

Additional Government Pleader (Pondy)

¶16

ORDER

¶17

(Order of the Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J)

¶18

IDBI Bank Limited, represented by its Authorised Officer, Chennai, has sought for a writ of mandamus, directing the District Magistrate-cum-Collector to dispose of the application dated 05.01.2017 bearing File No.233/DRDM/C3/SARFAESI/2017, under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.

¶19

Mr.B.Nambiselvan, learned Additional Government Pleader (Pondy) takes notice for the respondent.

¶20

Mr.Shivakumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that on the said application, hearing was held on 31.01.2018.

¶21

Having regard to the limited submission of the learned counsel for the bank, District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Pondicherry, is directed to dispose of the application dated 05.01.2017, if not done earlier, within a period of three weeks,

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. While doing so, District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Pondicherry, is directed to consider the parameters set out in Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.

¶24

With the above observation and direction, this writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

¶25

Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (CS IV )
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
ars
To
The District Magistrate-cum-Collector,
Puducherry.
+1cc to Government Pleader in sr.no.7651
W.P.No.2043 of 2018
nr 01/02/2018

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Idbi Bank Limited, v. The District Magistrate-cum-

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Idbi Bank Limited, v. The District Magistrate-cum-

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R. Bharani Vs The Branch Manager

P.Soundarapandian Vs The Registrar

R.Satyabhama Vs the Chief Manager

M/s.D.M.Traders, Vs The Authorised Officer

D.Sampath Vs The Authorised Officer

M/s.Yes Bank Ltd, Regd.Off: Vs The District Collector/