Allowed

N.Moorthi, v. The Inspector General of

Madras HC4 Jul 2018WP/16541/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner sought a certified copy of a Sale Deed from the Sub-Registrar. The court rejected the respondent's claim of document damage and directed the issuance of the certified copy within four weeks upon payment of charges.

What did the court decide?

Directed the 2nd respondent to issue a Certified copy of Sale Deed Document No.1954/1962 within four weeks upon payment of requisite charges.

N.Moorthi, Vs The Inspector General of — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 04.07.2018

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.RAJA

¶5

W.P.No.16541 of 2018

¶6

and

¶7

W.M.P.No.19728 of 2018

¶8

N.Moorthi ... Petitioner

¶9

Vs 1.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Chennai-4. 2.The Sub-Registrar, Pallavaram, Chennai-43. ... Respondents

¶10

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2^nd respondent to furnish the certified copy of the Sale Deed Document No.1954 of 1962 dated 18.9.1962 on the file of the Sub-Registrar, Pallavaram to the petitioner.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganesan

¶12

For Respondents: Mr.M.Thamizharasan, Government Advocate O R D E R

¶13

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2^nd respondent to furnish the certified copy of the Sale Deed Document No.1954 of 1962 dated 18.9.1962 on the file of the Sub-Registrar, Pallavaram to the petitioner.

¶14

Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate who takes notice for the respondents.

¶15

The petitioner claims to be owner of the property covered in Survey No.115, Paimash No.30/3 and Plot Nos.1066 and 1068 in No.154, Madipakkam Village, Ram Nagar South and he purchased the same from one Kamala Ammal, who purchased the same from one K.B.Gopinathan under a Registered Sale Deed Document No.1954/1962 on the file of the Sub-Registrar, Pallavaram. From the date of purchase, it is claimed that the petitioner has been

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

in possession and peaceful enjoyment of the same. The further case of the petitioner is that he was furnished with Xerox copy of the Sale Deed of the year 1962. The petitioner applied for the certified copy of the same to the 2^nd respondent on 8.6.2018, but the same was returned stating that the particular year of the document is in damaged condition. On verification, it was found that it is not in damaged condition. Hence the petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition.

¶18

Considering the facts and circumstances of the matter, the 2^nd respondent is directed to issue a Certified copy of the Sale Deed Document No.1954/1962 dated 18.9.1962 pending on his file on payment of requisite charges. The said exercises shall be completed within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.

¶19

The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No
costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is
closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
tsi
To
1.The Inspector General of Registration,
Santhome, Chennai-4.
2.The Sub-Registrar,
Pallavaram, Chennai-43.
+1cc to Mr.C.S.Associates, Advocate SR.No.43409
+1cc to Government Pleader SR.No.43635
W.P.No.16541 of 2018
SVI(CO)
GN(19/07/2018)

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

N.Moorthi, v. The Inspector General of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N.Moorthi, v. The Inspector General of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.Anandaraj Vs Mr.Pradeep Yadav IAS

Cheran Real Estates LLP Vs The Inspector General of

M.V. Ramalingam Vs Thiru. Harmander Singh, Ias.

A/M.Mangali Amman Thirukoil Vs the Secretary to Government

Ever King Granites Vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by

N.Mariyappan,S/o.Natesan Vs State Level Coordinator for