Dismissed

R.Arumugam, v. All India Council for

Madras HC5 Jan 2018WP/141/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandate for transparent counseling and an NEET-like exam for Engineering College management quota admissions to eliminate capitation fees. The Chief Justice granted leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a detailed one.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a detailed writ petition.

R.Arumugam, Vs All India Council for — Education and Admissions | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 05.01.2018

¶3

CORAM

¶4

The HON'BLE MS.INDIRA BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶5

AND

¶6

The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶7

W.P.No.141 of 2018
R.Arumugam .. Petitioner
vs.
1.All Council for Technical Education,
Nelson Mandela Marg,
Vasan Kunj,
New Delhi – 110 067.
2.The University Grants Commission (UGC),
Bahadur Shah Zagar Marg,
New Delhi – 110 002.
3.The Principal Secretary to Governor,
Raj Bhavan, Chennai – 600 022.
4.The State of Tamil Nadu,
rep. by its Secretary to Government,
Higher Education Department,
Fort St. George,
Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.
5.The President,
Consortium of Self-Finance Professional,
Arts and Science Colleges in Tamil Nadu,
AF 57, 11 th Main Road,
Anna Nagar West,
Chennai – 600 040.
6.The Directorate of Technical Education (DoTE),
53, Sardar Patel Road,
Guindy, Chennai – 600 025.

¶8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶9

7.The Association of Management of Coimbatore Anna University Affiliated Colleges, Consortium Office: Site No.18, SF No.586, 1^st Part, SS Avenue, (Behind Millennium Motors) Avinashi Road, Coimbatore – 641 014. 8.The Admission Oversee Committee, DPI Compound, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 008. 9.The Registrar, Anna University, Chennai – 600 025. .. Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 4 to 8 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.8.2017 and thereby direct the respondents 1 and 2 introduce a transparent system of counseling for admission of students in the management quota of Engineering Colleges on par with the NEET examinations conducted by the All India Medical Council, in order to eradicate the collection of lump sum of capitation fee by the Self Financing Engineering Colleges in Tamil Nadu and to make ensure that meritorious students or candidates getting admission in the Engineering Colleges. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Mohana Murali for Mr.A.Rajeshkanna For Respondents : Mr.E.Manoharan Addl. Government Pleader for respondent Nos.3,4,6 & 8 Mr.M.Vijayakumar for respondent No.9 ORDER

¶10

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Leave is given to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a detailed writ petition impleading the concerned private Colleges.

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a detailed writ petition. No costs.

Sd/-

Deputy Registrar

//True Copy//

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶17

bbr

¶18

To:
1.All Council for Technical Education,
Nelson Mandela Marg,
Vasan Kunj,
New Delhi – 110 067.
2.The University Grants Commission (UGC),
Bahadur Shah Zagar Marg,
New Delhi – 110 002.
3.The Principal Secretary to Governor,
Raj Bhavan, Chennai – 600 022.
4.The Secretary to Government,
Higher Education Department,
Fort St. George,
Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.
5.The President,
Consortium of Self-Finance Professional,
Arts and Science Colleges in Tamil Nadu,
AF 57, 11 th Main Road,
Anna Nagar West, Chennai – 600 040.
6.The Directorate of Technical Education (DoTE),
53, Sardar Patel Road,
Guindy, Chennai – 600 025.
7.The Association of Management of
Coimbatore Anna University Affiliated Colleges,
Consortium Office:
Site No.18, SF No.586,
1 st Part, SS Avenue,
(Behind Millennium Motors)
Avinashi Road, Coimbatore – 641 014.

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

8.The Admission Oversee Committee, DPI Compound, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 008.

¶21

9.The Registrar, Anna University, Chennai – 600 025.

¶22

+1cc to Mr.A.RAJESHKANNA Advocate, S.R.No. 1265 +1cc to Mr.M.VIJAYAKUMAR Advocate, S.R.No. 1035 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No. 1104

¶23

W.P.No.141 of 2018

¶24

TR(17/01/2018)

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Arumugam, v. All India Council for

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Arumugam, v. All India Council for

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Defodill Mobiles Marketing Vs M/S.Redington(India) Limited

The Commissioner of Income Vs M/S.Adroit Urban Developers

D.Senthilkumar Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

A. Sakthivel Vs The District Collector

C.v.Unnirajan Vs The Managing Director

K.Ravichandran, Vs The Commissioner, Hindu