M.Rani v. the Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed by mother and minor children directing Tahsildar to consider representation for mutation of revenue records regarding deceased husband's estate. Court directed fresh comprehensive representation and disposal within specified timelines.
What did the court decide?
Directed to submit fresh comprehensive representation within one week; respondent to dispose within four weeks thereafter.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.04.2018
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
W.P.No.13422 of 2011
1.M.Rani
2.Manonmani (minor)
3.Uma Maheswari (minor) ... Petitioners
(2 & 3 are Minors rep by their
mother natural Guardian M.Rani)
-Vs-
The Tahsildar, Gummidipoondi Taluk Office, Gummidipoondi 601 201, Tiruvallur District. ... Respondent
Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to consider the representation of the 1st petitioner, dated 07.02.2011 for mutation of revenue records in respect of the estate of the deceased, Munivel in favour of the 1st petitioner in accordance with law.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent Tahsildar should be directed to consider the petitioners' representation for mutation of revenue records.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Rani
- respondent
Manonmani
- respondent
Uma Maheswari
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Gummidipoondi Taluk Office
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court