Dismissed

Sri Ramakrishna Dental v. the State of Tamilnadu

Madras HC26 Sept 2018WP/12251/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court held that since the admission process for the 2013-2014 academic year was over and the cause of action had expired, the writ petition filed to quash the allocation of seats was infructuous and lacked any surviving adjudication.

What did the court decide?

No relief granted as the petition was dismissed as infructuous. Connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

Sri Ramakrishna Dental Vs the State of Tamilnadu — Education and Admissions | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Dated : 26.09.2018

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR

¶5

W.P.No. 12251 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2013

¶6

Sri Ramakrishna Dental College and Hospital, Represented by its Chief Executive Officer, S.N.R.College Road, Coimbatore – 641 006.

¶7

...Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Health and Family Welfare Department, Fort St.George, Secretariat,

¶10

Chennai – 600 009.

¶11

2.The Tamil Nadu Dr.MGR Medical University, Represented by its Registrar, No.69, Anna Salai, Guindy,

¶12

Chennai – 600 032.

¶13

3.Tamil Nadu Private Dental Colleges Association, Represented by its President, 2/102, East Coast Road,

¶14

Uthandi, Chennai 600019.

¶15

...Respondents

¶16

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari or calling for the records of the first respondent in G.O.(Ms).No.13 Health and Family Welfare Department dated 22.01.2013 and the consequential proceedings of the second respondent in Rc.No.Affln.IV(2)/01665/2012 dated 06.02.2013, quash the same.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.Jenasenan For R1 : Mrs.V.Annalakshmi,

¶18

Government Advocate

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

ORDER

¶21

This writ petition is filed for issuance of a writ of certiorari to quash the impugned order namely G.O.(Ms).No.13 dated 22.01.2013. The impugned Government Order is regarding to the apportionment of seats between the Government and the Management for the academic year 2013-2014.

¶22

In view of the fact that the admission and the cause of action for the whole admission process is over for the academic year 2013-2014, this court is of the view that nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition.

¶23

Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

Assistant Registrar(CS IX)

¶26

//True Copy//

¶27

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶28

mbi/rpl

¶29

¶30

1.The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Health and Family Welfare Department, Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

¶31

+2 cc to Mr.A.Jenasenan Advocate sr 67312

¶32

+1 cc to the Government Pleader sr 67052

¶33

W.P.No. 12251 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2013

¶34

aa15/10/2018

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Sri Ramakrishna Dental v. the State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Ramakrishna Dental v. the State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Minor P.S.Arthigamalar Vs The Director,Neet Examination

Geetha Priya, Minor Vs the Secretary to the

Dr.M.Ilanchelian, Vs The Registrar

Nijamudeen, Vs Ramshad Ali

Royal College of Engineering Vs Anna University

S.Sabareeswaran, Minor, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu