Disposed

Dr.Aravind Raj G.G., v. The Secretary to the Goverment

Madras HC10 May 2018WP/12184/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner challenged the rank list for PG medical seats due to alleged errors in community classification. The court directed the 3rd respondent to reconsider the representation and correct the rank list if a mistake existed before counseling, then disposed of the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Directions to 3rd respondent to accept fresh representation, verify community entry, and reflect corrections in rank list before counseling.

Dr.Aravind Raj G.G., Vs The Secretary to the… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 10.05.2018

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶5

W.P.No.12184 of 2018 and WPMP.Nos.14213 of 2018

¶6

Dr.Arvind Raj G.V
... Petitioner
Versus
1.The Secretary to the
Government of Tamilnadu,
Higher Education Department,
Fort. St. George,
Chennai 600 009.
2. The Director,
Directorate of Medical Education,
162, EVR Periyar Salai,
Kilpauk,
Chennai 600 010
3. The Convenor,
Selection Committee,
Directorate of Medical Education,
162, EVR Periyar Salai, Kilpauk,
Chennai 600 010.
4. The National Board of Examinations,
NEET PG – 2018,
Medical Enclave, Ansari Nagar,
Mahatma Gandhi Marg (Ring Road),
New Delhi – 110 029
5. Medical Council of India,
Pocket 14, Sector – 8
Dwaraka Phase – I,
New Delhi – 110 077. ... Respondents

¶7

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶8

PRAYER: Writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to reserve a Post Graduate Medical Seat for the petitioner under the OBC Category in Management quota (including NRI) seats in Self – Financing Medical Colleges in Tamil Nadu 2018-2019 Session, in the State of Tamil Nadu.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Venkatachalpathy, Senior Counsel for Mr.Venkatesh Mahadevan For Respondents : Mr.K.Karthikeyan, Government Advocate for R1 to R3

¶10

Mr.V.P.Raman for R5 ORDER

¶11

The relief sought for in this writ petition is for a direction to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to reserve a Postgraduate Medical Seat for the petitioner under the OBC Category in Management quota including (NRI) Seats in Self Financing Medical Colleges in Tamil Nadu 2018-2019 Session, in the state of Tamil Nadu.

¶12

Mr.M.Venkatachalapathy, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner made a submission that the community entries made in respect of this writ petitioner is erroneous. Based on the wrong consideration, his name is included in the rank list and he is entitled to get a better position in the ranking list on account of the community which he belongs. At the outset, the learned senior counsel on behalf of the petitioner states that the authorities have committed a mistake in considering the case of the petitioner and rank list was erroneously prepared in respect of the writ petitioner and the community to which the writ petitioner belongs, has not been properly considered by the competent authority.

¶13

In this view of the matter, the writ petitioner is at liberty to submit a fresh representation immediately setting out all the facts and circumstances and by enclosing all relevant document to the 3rd respondent and in the event of any such representation from the petitioner, the 3rd respondent is directed to consider the said representation and correct, if any mistake had occurred and include the name of the petitioner in the rank list in the appropriate place, enabling the petitioner to participate in the next counseling and such an exercise is to be done before the date of counseling.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶16

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy//

¶17

Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Secretary to the
Government of Tamilnadu,
Higher Education Department,
Fort. St. George,
Chennai 600 009.
2. The Director,
Directorate of Medical Education,
162, EVR Periyar Salai,
Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010
3. The Convenor,
Selection Committee,
Directorate of Medical Education,
162, EVR Periyar Salai, Kilpauk,
Chennai 600 010.
+1 cc to Mr.Ventakesh mahadev Advocate sr 38532
+1 cc to the Govt pleader sr 33585

¶18

WP.No.12184 of 2018 and WPMP.Nos.14213 of 2018 aa11/05/2018

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Dr.Aravind Raj G.G., v. The Secretary to the Goverment

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr.Aravind Raj G.G., v. The Secretary to the Goverment

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Kabali, Vs The Tamilnadu State Co-ope.

Vellingiri Hill Tribal Vs The District Collector

R.Chandrasekar Vs Inspector of Police

Dr.J.Yogesh, Vs The Secretary

Acchutha Institute of Vs The Syndicate, Periyar

S.Manjula Vs The District Collector