This judgment is a one-line order dismissing a writ petition under Article 226 for non-prosecution due to the absence of the petitioner's representatives. It contains no substantive legal reasoning, application of provisions, or analysis. It serves no precedential value regarding the merits of the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29.10.2018
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.11557 of 2013 M.P.Nos.2 & 3 of 2013
1.The Special Thasildar, Tambaram Taluk Office, Tambaram, Chennai – 600 024.
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorari, call for the records in proceedings 10032/2001 dated 24.10.2001 on the file of respondent and quash the same.
For Petitioner :No appearance
For Respondents :Mr.D.Raghu
Government Advocate for R1 & R2 Ms.R.Meenakshi for R3
When the Matter was listed for hearing on 26.10.2018, there was no representation on behalf of the writ petitioner and it was directed to be listed under the caption for “being mentioned”. Today, the case is listed for hearing (i.e. 29.10.2018) under the caption “for dismissal”. But, today also none represented on behalf of the writ petitioner.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
pns
To
Tambaram Taluk Office,
Tambaram, Chennai – 600 024.
+1 cc to The Government Pleader, Sr.No.74403
W.P.No.11557 of 2013 M.P.Nos.2 & 3 of 2013
GMI(CO) CSL/04.01.2019
K.Nirmal Kumar
K.Sundarapandian
K.Bhavani
K.Bharathi
T.Kathirvelu
The Special Thasildar, Tambaram Taluk Office
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
