M. Maruthu Pandian v. The District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner filed a writ petition invoking Article 226 to direct the District Collector and District Manager, TASMAC, to consider a representation dated 23.03.2018 regarding a proposed shop location within a stipulated time. The Court allowed the petition based on the representation received from the second respondent stating no shop was approved at the said location.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is allowed, directing the respondents to consider the representation within a stipulated time.