5.Undoubtedly, the representation was submitted by the writ petitioner, only when the petitioner was an employee of the organisation. The authorities competent are expected to be more transparent and to accept the better suggestions from the employees also, who are working for the Corporation. For long years, the efficiency of the administration has improved with the opinions, ideas and ideologies of the higher officials and also that of the employees. Thus, the ideas and opinions provided by the employees for the betterment of the Corporation, can never be brushed aside. Whenever an opinion is submitted for the betterment of the administration or Corporation, the higher authorities are bound to srutinize or consider the same in the interest of the public at large, since the Corporation is a state and public organisation. When the respondent Corporation is also functioning from and out of the funds of the Government, then it is to be construed that, they are bound to correct the mistakes or allegations, if any, pointed out to them. Contrarily, the higher officials cannot simply reject such suggestions and opinions by stating that the opinions given by the employees, cannot be considered at all. Such an attitude can never be appreciated by the Courts. Ideas and opinions, provided by the experienced employees of the organisation are also to be considered by the administrators. Administrators of a public organisation can never claim dictatorship in a democratic country. The opinions and suggestions made by any citizen have to be respected in all aspects and the same is our constitutional perspective.
