Dismissed

Raymond Ruban v. The Authorised Officer

Madras HC17 Jan 2018WP/11081/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The writ petition was listed for a withdrawal. Upon the petitioner's counsel seeking permission to withdraw, the High Court dismissed the petition, granting no leave to file a fresh one on the same cause of action and awarding no costs.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition was allowed; no leave granted to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action.

Raymond Ruban Vs The Authorised Officer — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 17.01.2018

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

¶7

W.P.No.11081 of 2017

¶8

Raymond Ruban, Proprietor, M/s.Shynee Construction, No.7, Panchayat Colony, Radha Nagar, Chrompet, Chennai - 600 044. ... Petitioner

¶9

vs. The Authorised Officer, Punjab & Sind Bank, No.1/334, ASK Towers, Navalur, Chennai - 603 103. ... Respondent

¶10

WRIT Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorari, calling or the records, pertaining to the order dated 6.4.2017, made in AIR (SA) 570 of 2016, on the file of the Hon'ble Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, in dismissing the Appeal filed against the order dated 24.11.2016, made in S.A.No.136 of 2016, on the file of the Hon'ble Debts Recovery Tribunal-III, Chennai and quash the same.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Prasath

¶12

ORDER

¶13

(Order of the Court was delivered by S.MANIKUMAR, J)

¶14

For non compliance of pre-deposit ordered in AIR SA No.570 of 2016 dated 06.04.2017, Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai has dismissed the appeal. Being aggrieved, Mr.Raymond Ruban, Proprietor of M/s.Shynee Construction, Chennai has filed the instant writ petition.

¶15

Mr.R.Prasath, learned counsel for the petitioner, has circulated a letter dated 12.01.2018, to the Registry, seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition. Hence, W.P.No.11081 of 2017 is listed today under the caption 'for withdrawal'.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

Added further, Mr.R.Prasath, made submission seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition. Letter dated 12.01.2018, shall form part of the record.

¶18

3. Placing on record the above, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No leave is granted to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action. No Costs.

¶19

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-II)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ars
To
The Authorised Officer,
Punjab & Sind Bank,
No.1/334, ASK Towers,
Navalur, Chennai - 603 103.
+1cc to Mr.R.SELVAKUMAR, Advocate, S.R.No. 3178
W.P.No.11081 of 2017
LRS(CO)
TR(07/02/2018)

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Raymond Ruban v. The Authorised Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raymond Ruban v. The Authorised Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Hybro Chains (P)Ltd., Vs Debts Recovery Appellate

M/S.Pioneer Feeds & Poultry Vs the Reserve Bank of India

Chokhani International Ltd., Vs Industrial Devp. Bank of India

Gk Steels and Allied Vs The Registrar

Pps Enviro Power Pvt. Ltd. Vs State Bank of India

V.J.Dhanapal Vs Union Bank of India